Orange County NC Website
5 <br /> 1 a. Visual Arts: Composed of OCAC Board Members with visual arts expertise, as <br /> 2 well as one visual arts professional from the community. <br /> 3 b. Performing Arts: Composed of OCAC Board Members with performing arts <br /> 4 expertise, as well as one performing arts professional from the community. <br /> 5 c. Arts in Education: Composed of OCAC Board Members with public education <br /> 6 experience. <br /> 7 4. Non-governmental Grassroots Arts Program (GAP) applicants are also evaluated by a <br /> 8 Financial Review Panel that evaluates the organization's submitted financial documents <br /> 9 to determine financial solvency and stability. Factors considered include the ratio of <br /> 10 administrative or fundraising expense in overall budget, as well as a deficit or surplus <br /> 11 without explanation and/or stated plan. <br /> 12 5. Each panel meets in person to evaluate assigned applications. Feedback, first strengths <br /> 13 and then challenges, is offered by panelists and recorded by the Director. After <br /> 14 discussion, each panelist submits a score through the online platform for each of the <br /> 15 categories below. After all scores are submitted, the director records the final average <br /> 16 score per applicant. <br /> 17 6. The scoring rubric for each grant program is as follows: <br /> 18 GRASSROOTS ARTS PROGRAM GRANTS <br /> 19 Artistic Merit— 35% <br /> 20 Community Impact— 30% <br /> 21 Program Management— 15% <br /> 22 Financial Review— 10% <br /> 23 NC Arts Council Priority of Funding — 10% <br /> 24 ARTIST PROJECT GRANTS <br /> 25 Artistic Merit— 50% <br /> 26 Community Impact— 25% <br /> 27 Program Management— 25% <br /> 28 ARTS IN EDUCATION GRANTS <br /> 29 Artistic Merit—40% <br /> 30 Integration in curriculum and/or enrichment—40% <br /> 31 Need (Free and Reduced Lunch Percentage)— 20% <br /> 32 7. Funding decisions are made at the next Advisory Board meeting. This year, funds were <br /> 33 divided based on the percentage of applicants from each category. Artists represented <br /> 34 41% of applications, organizations 34%, and schools 25%. Therefore, the total of <br /> 35 available funding ($62,058) was divided within those framework percentages. <br /> 36 8. Within each of the three categories, applicants are funded based on their score, e.g., an <br /> 37 application with a score of 73 would receive 73% of their request. If excess funds were <br /> 38 available in a category after dispersing funds based on score, they were divided among <br /> 39 all recipients in that category. <br /> 40 9. All applicants are notified of the panel's decisions. All GAP applicants received panel <br /> 41 feedback. Artist Project Grant applicants can receive feedback upon request. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Katie Murray said the Arts Commission received 80 grant requests for$187,560. She <br /> 44 said 30 (38%) were first time applicants, and the Commission funded 60% of eligible request <br /> 45 this year, and awarded $28,800 in Orange County funds, and $31,703 in State Grassroots Arts <br /> 46 Program Funds. She said 43 grants were funded, included 10 first time applicants. She said <br /> 47 the Commission received more applications from individual artists than organizations, and <br /> 48 recipients included 16 artists, 15 non-profit organizations, and 12 schools. She said state <br /> 49 grassroots funds and the Piedmont Laureate program usually also support the Commission's <br /> 50 funds; the Piedmont Laureate program will not be funded this year, but these funds were funded <br /> 51 through the Arts Commissions' general budget. She thanked the BOCC for its ongoing support. <br />