Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-11-2001-jpa
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 04-11-2001
>
Agenda - 04-11-2001-jpa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:56:18 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:30:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/11/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
jpa
Document Relationships
Minutes - 04-11-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />In May 2000,. the Chapel Hill Town Council adjusted its Urban Services Boundary to the south <br />of Town, reducing the area that is encompassed by this boundary. The southern edge of Chapel <br />Hill's Urban Services Boundary no longer is the County line; the urban azea now stops just south <br />of the existing Southern Village development. <br />Chapel Hi11 has not requested any change to land use designations in this "Southern Triangle." <br />The azea is designated as Rural Residential on Chapel Hill's new 2000 Land Use Plan (1 <br />dwelling unit per 2-5 acres). This is consistent with the designations on the 1986 Joint Planning <br />Area Land Use Plan which calls the area a combination of Rural Residential and Chapel Hill <br />Transition. The "Chapel Hill Transition" designation is a procedural and jurisdictional <br />designation, which the Chapel Hill Town Council has not requested to be changed. <br />Zt maybe appropriate to begin discussion of jurisdictional issues near the Chatham County line at <br />some paint. <br />Preliminary .Recommendation <br />The Planning staffs of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Orange County recommend approval of the <br />proposed amendment to the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan and Map, with the exception of <br />differing recommendations on designations for the Greene Tract. We fmd the recommendations <br />of the proposed amendments to be consistent with the Joint Planning Operating Principles. Far <br />the Greene Tract, alternative recommendations are: (1) No change at this time; (2) Change <br />designation to Housing/Open Space; and (3) Change designation to Public Use. <br />Attachments• <br />1. Maps <br />2. Copy of Joint Planning Area Operating Principles <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.