Orange County NC Website
MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES <br />March 21, 2011 <br />3 <br />increases and decreases greater than $5,000. <br /> <br />Ms. Garavaglia asked how Volunteers for Youth is associated with the agency. Ms. Coston replied <br />that there is a grant for justice programs that funds several nonprofit organizations. The funds are <br />in another account outside of the Social Services’ budget. Ms. Hinton added that Volunteers for <br />Youth receives funds for juvenile crime prevention. <br /> <br />Ms. Garavaglia asked whether the costs for IT support will decrease or stay the same. Lindsey <br />Shewmaker replied that the costs will stay flat or increase at a slight rate over time. The contract <br />provides ongoing system maintenance for IT software. <br /> <br />Albert Williams asked whether the Adolescent Parenting Program deals with the whole family. Ms. <br />Coston responded that the whole family is included, and that often the grandparents have an active <br />role in the upbringing of the child. A major component of the program is the family environment. <br /> <br />Claire Millar asked about the increase in the contract amount for the Family Violence Prevention <br />Center. Ms. Shewmaker replied that this year the contract amount includes the total dollars <br />available for family violence prevention even though the agency only pays the center for counseling <br />services. This is really a result of the county’s request that the contract amounts equal the line item <br />amount. <br /> <br />Ms. Garavaglia asked for clarification on why the school social workers in Orange County are <br />supervised by Social Services but not the ones located Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools. Ms. <br />Foushee responded that Chapel Hill’s social workers are funded by the district tax. Ms. Coston <br />added that since Orange County does not have a district tax, the social workers are funded via a <br />special funding source through Medicaid. The school pays the difference between the Medicaid <br />reimbursement rate and the cost of the program. Ms. Foushee added that there is a similar <br />relationship with the Health Department to fund school nurses. <br /> <br />Ms. Coston pointed to the workload measures in the performance summaries at the end of the <br />budget for additional information about increases in caseloads. This is another indicator of the <br />struggles staff are having keeping up with their workload while maintaining morale. She noted that <br />a lot of staff and agency resources are used in child welfare and adult protective services. Even <br />though those case numbers are small relative to public assistance, they are very time-intensive. <br />The demands for agency administration have stayed fairly constant, but the staffing levels are lower <br />after last year’s cuts, which has created some problems. The other program areas have had few <br />changes since last year that will impact the budget. <br /> <br />Ms. Coston added that the agency continues to look at ways to innovate. <br /> <br />Ms. Foushee noted that the budget looks pretty lean. She added that there is minimal change in <br />the net county costs. Ms. Coston stated that management is concerned that if anything goes <br />wrong, there is little room in the budget to handle problems. Ms. Millar asked whether the current <br />vacancies will have to remain vacant. Ms. Coston responded that they do not have to stay vacant, <br />but various issues, including a six-month hiring freeze, have delayed filling several of them. Ms. <br />Coston stated she hopes the county will not make any additional cuts. Ms. Foushee stated that the <br />BOCC has serious interest in social safety net issues and will do what it can to protect these <br />services. <br /> <br />Ms. Garavaglia asked to add Social Services’ role in emergency preparedness to a future Board <br />Meeting. <br />