Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-03-2001-10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 04-03-2001
>
Agenda - 04-03-2001-10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:28:07 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:30:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 04-03-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jordan Lake Water Supply Allocation <br />January 2001 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />timing of this is known. At that time, the historic trend of increasing water demands would level <br />off at a demand of between 16 and 22 MGD (not depicted on this graph, which extends only to <br />2035). <br />Rate of Quarry Expansion and Ultimate Capacity -The ultimate yield of the Quarry Reservoir <br />will depend on its water storage capacity. Sustainable yield projections illustrated in the attached <br />figure are based on a final capacity of 3 BG. The current capacity of ,American Stone's active <br />quarry is approximately 1 BG. OWASA's existing Quarry Reservoir has a storage volume of 0.2 <br />BG. American Stone's agreement with OWASA contains a "due diligence" commitment to <br />maintain rock production at an average rate of 650,000 tons per year, which corresponds to a <br />quarry pit volume increase of 0.065 billion gallons per year. At this rate, quarry volume will <br />increase by 1.95 BG over the next 30 years, providing a total volume of slightly more than 3 BG. <br />If -due to economic conditions, market competition, or changes in corporate policy -American <br />Stone's production activity decreased below this level, or if the company went out of business <br />arid stopped production altogether, then the usable storage volume and resulting water supply <br />yield would be less than what has been projected. <br />Meteorological Variation and Climatic Change -The sustainable yield estimates calculated for <br />OWASA's existing and future raw water supply system were based on historic temperature and <br />streamflow records that reflect the natural variation and uncertainty characteristic of such <br />observations. To the extent that future weather conditions differ from the historic range -- <br />reflecting either short term variation or longer term climatic changes -the yield of OWASA's <br />water supply system will differ from what has been projected. <br />Is There Still a Rale for Jordan.Lake in OWASA's Water Supply Fntnre? <br />Even assuming the anticipated approval of the Extended Stone Quarry Reservoir, OWASA faces <br />a potential 1 to 3 MGD water supply shortfall for a period of several years before the new 3 BG <br />Quarry Reservoir can be put into service. If any conditions of service area growth, quarry <br />production rates, or 30-year weather trends differ fmm those that have been assumed, the extent <br />and duration ofthe water supply shortfall may be greater or lesser. In keeping with OWASA's <br />past practices and with industry standards of maintaining as many viable and reliable water <br />supply options as possible, OWASA should retain at least a portion of its Jordan Lake water <br />supply allocation. <br />How Much? <br />It is clear from the EMC's application requirements that the new round of allocations will be <br />based on a more rigorous analysis of demand forecasts and supply alternatives than has been <br />applied in the past. It is unlikely that allgcations will be issued in the absence of thorough and <br />credible demonstrations of need, which have been provided in the application materials. <br />Because OWASA recognizes tl:at its anticipated needs do not warrant the full IO~MGD Level <br />II allocation that it currently holds, the draft application voluntarily offers to adjust OWASA's <br />allocation downward to S MGD. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.