Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-28-2001-4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 03-28-2001
>
Agenda - 03-28-2001-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 5:17:23 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:30:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/28/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 03-28-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
required and what's merely recommended, they sometimes run into a brick wall, buck- <br />passing between state and local officials, or both. <br />State funding biases <br />Like acreage standards, state reimbursement policies can also tip the. scales in <br />favor of building new schools and against the upgrading of existing schools. <br />One problem is the so-called "60% rule." This says: If the cost of renovating an <br />older school exceeds 60% of the cost of a new school, the school district should build a <br />new school if the district wants to receive financial assistance from the state.l $ The <br />....percentages vary: Massachusetts has applied a 50% rule; Minnesota, a 60% rule; <br />Washington State, an SO% rule. <br />The problem with such arbitrary percentage rules is that they prevent a full cost <br />analysis by state and local governments and arbitrarily eliminate sound renovation <br />projects. Certain new construction costs -- items such as land acquisition, water and <br />sewer line extensions, transportation and road work, for example -- may not be factored <br />into the comparison. The same thing is true of the costs of maintaining or demolishing a <br />school building taken out of service. If these costs were considered, renovation projects <br />might meet the percentage rule more easily.19 The rules also discount other values, such <br />as a community's desire to maintain a school as a neighborhood anchor ar to have a <br />school to which children can walk. <br />State reimbursement policies can also discourage the proper maintenance of <br />existing schools. A Massachusetts report found that state funding sources for school <br />maintenance and repair have the "iu~urteritional side effect of rewarding schools that <br />allow their facilities to deteriorate with new school buildings." In many areas; claims for <br />building maintenance funds must compete with demands on operating budgets. Faced <br />with the choice of hiring several new teachers or fixing a leafing roof, a school district is <br />more likely to hire the teachers, even though deferred maintenance of the school building <br />may generate a huge tab later on. Criven reimbursement rates, it may seem more cost <br />effective for a town to build a new school -- , or undertake a maj or renovation in a few <br />years -- than to properly care for a school building over the long term. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.