Browse
Search
Minutes 09-10-2019 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2019
>
Minutes 09-10-2019 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2019 2:57:01 PM
Creation date
10/3/2019 11:00:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/10/2019
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-10-2019 Regular Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 09-10-19 Work Session
Agenda 09-10-19 Item 1 - Presentation Regarding the Potential Regulation of the Discharge of Firearms in Areas of the County with High Residential Unit Density
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 09-10-19 Work Session
Agenda 09-10-19 Item 2 - Discussion of Board of Commissioners Draft Meeting Schedule for Calendar Year 2020
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 09-10-19 Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br />John Roberts said he talked with Durham, and it previously regulated firearms in a <br />manner similar to the ideas being presented tonight. He said Durham’s original ordinance <br />focused on housing density in approved subdivisions, but it was repealed due to the difficulty of <br />enforcement. He said Durham changed to no shooting within 900 feet from government <br />buildings, private residences, churches, and schools. He said this may work in Durham County, <br />but he would suggest that it would not work for Orange County. He said Orange County still has <br />significant areas that are rural in nature, and 900 feet would eat into a lot of private property. He <br />said Durham is much more urbanized than Orange County, and it did not experience much <br />opposition to the ordinance change in its public hearings. <br />John Roberts said Durham required a permit in order to shoot within 900 feet of one of <br />these areas, and the permit process was convoluted, requiring a public hearing before the Board <br />of County Commissioners (BOCC) prior to issuing a permit. He said he expects the 900-foot rule <br />to be equally difficult to enforce. <br />John Roberts referred to a map on the screen, and in the Commissioners’ packet, which <br />the County GIS staff prepared. He said the map divides Orange County’s rural area into red grid <br />squares that are 10-acre parcels with at least ten houses in them. He said these parcels are <br />linked by the green lines within one mile of each other. He said ten acres with ten houses on it is <br />just an example, and is probably not equivalent to a suburban-type density. He said he <br />recommends that GIS or the Planning Department determine what constitutes suburban type <br />density, and figure out where those areas are in the County. He said this may be a higher <br />number, 20 houses per 10-acre grid square, and thus the regulated areas would be substantially <br />smaller. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if the red squares on this map would also include areas <br />that are denser than 10 houses on a 10-acre parcel. <br />John Roberts said each red grid square represents an area where there are at least ten <br />houses, and yes, it could be as many as 20 houses. He said this ordinance would also apply in <br />the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) areas. <br />Commissioner Price asked if the green lines could be explained. <br />John Roberts said these are just boundary lines of where the areas are, and it is not a <br />recommended line. He said if the Board wants to pursue this option, GIS or Planning will need to <br />determine the actual boundaries. He said this could be based on roads, property lines, GIS <br />coordinates, etc. He said these boundaries would need to be able to be located in order to <br />enforce the ordinance. <br />Commissioner Greene asked if the areas within the green lines would have the ordinance <br />enforced. <br />John Roberts said that would need to be determined. He said all of the clusters are <br />within a mile of each other, and the question remains whether the Board would want to include <br />all of the empty spaces. He said he would not think this would be necessary, and he would not <br />recommend the 900-foot limit set by Durham, as Orange County has existing restrictions based <br />on a 450-foot limit on hunting around schools or government buildings, etc. <br />Commissioner McKee said he would be interested in the red boxes having a name, so <br />the affected areas are more easily identifiable. He said there are definitely areas where firearm <br />use makes no sense, but there are other areas that are wide open and restriction seems <br />unnecessary. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said he would also like to have the road names on the map. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos asked if the work on the ETJ areas remains to be done. <br />John Roberts said absolutely. He said the ETJs have density in some areas, and the <br />green lines may go away completely, and the ordinance could be based on subdivisions. He <br />said this is all up to the Board. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said the Board should discuss if the ETJs should be a no-shot <br />zone by themselves, since these are areas where development is expected.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.