Orange County NC Website
12 <br /> 1 Commissioner Marcoplos said it seems odd that some residents picked up it, while <br /> 2 others did not. <br /> 3 Nancy Freeman said it may depend on the person, the level of research conducted, the <br /> 4 attorney that was chosen, etc. <br /> 5 Commissioner Dorosin said it could also depend on how a parcel is shaped. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> 8 John Guibert said this is a very complex subject. He said he would like to address the <br /> 9 question of why other landowners were not concerned or aware of the issue. He said the owner <br /> 10 of the Arrowhead land (the Nichols family) was also the President of Lake Orange, Inc. at the <br /> 11 time that all of these deals were made; when the land was transferred from the five owners to <br /> 12 Lake Orange, Inc., which was land from 620 down. He said this was also the time when the <br /> 13 transfer of 615 and down was made. He said ownership was well known, and the County <br /> 14 required that the land between 615 and 620 be owned by Lake Orange, Inc. He said the <br /> 15 County was to be informed of, and given the right of first refusal on this land, in the case that <br /> 16 there was a transfer of the land to another owner. He said the County wanted to protect 615 to <br /> 17 620, which was the maximum flood stage. He said it is unequivocal that this land is owned by <br /> 18 Lake Orange, Inc., and the owner of the Arrowhead subdivision knew full well. He said the very <br /> 19 first deed for each of the 15 lots accounts for an exception of the land between 615-620, which <br /> 20 did not convey as part of the sale. He said the Nichols family knew they had made a mistake, <br /> 21 and did not solve it by a survey, but rather by noting the exemption of the land on the deeds. <br /> 22 He said there was a new survey of sorts in the 1980s, which was an attempt to show where the <br /> 23 lines lay on the 615-620 contour, but staff rejected these surveys for every lot. He said this all <br /> 24 shows that both Lake Orange, Inc., and the owner of the subdivision knew exactly who owned <br /> 25 the land. He said it also very clear that the County was informed. <br /> 26 John Guibert said two newer subdivisions were built in the 1990s, and this issue was <br /> 27 clearly handled, and the land delineated, so as to avoid these same problems. He said in order <br /> 28 to know what amount of back taxes one should claim, one must know the amount of land in <br /> 29 question, and the percentage of one's taxes it constitutes. He said he did a survey of his land, <br /> 30 to determine how much of his land between 615 and 620 belongs to Lake Orange, Inc., and on <br /> 31 which he had paid taxes. He said this survey showed he paid taxes on land that belonged to <br /> 32 somebody else, and the County was aware due to the 1986 plats that were attached. He said <br /> 33 there has never been any sale of the 615-620 land, and if there were, the County would have to <br /> 34 first be advised and given the right of first refusal. He said ownership is clear in his mind, as is <br /> 35 the question of double taxation. He said he has paperwork back to 2003 showing that he has <br /> 36 paid taxes on the 0.37 acres of land owned by Lake Orange, Inc. He said the County has <br /> 37 changed his taxable land to 1.53 acres, but he, and all previous owners, have been taxed for <br /> 38 the land all the way to the water line. He said 2 parties were paying taxes on the same piece of <br /> 39 land, which is a clear case of double taxation. He said staff can explain the basis on which the <br /> 40 County has been taxing Lake Orange, Inc. <br /> 41 Commissioner Dorosin referred to a picture on page 13 of the PowerPoint, and asked if <br /> 42 the property with the blue arrow belonged to John Guilbert. <br /> 43 John Guibert said yes. <br /> 44 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the dock belonged to him, and if he built it. <br /> 45 John Guibert said the dock was pre-existing, and is accessed through a recorded <br /> 46 easement. <br /> 47 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the Board has a copy of this easement. <br /> 48 John Guibert said there is an easement for every lot in the subdivision. He said the <br /> 49 easement was granted to each of the families that donated land from 620 out, after they <br /> 50 donated the land from 620 in and below. He said this happened in 1972, and is documented. <br />