Agenda 10-01-19 Item 8-a - Minutes

Browse Search

3 1 b) require discharged projectiles to remain on the property on which they were discharged; and 2 c) require individuals discharging firearms to maintain adequate backstops. These 3 recommendations were adopted by the Board of Commissioners. 4 5 The Board of Commissioners continues to receive complaints from residents related to the 6 discharge of firearms near populated areas and directed the County Attorney to examine this 7 issue and provide a presentation for Board discussion. North Carolina General Statute 153A- 8 129 specifically authorizes counties to regulate the discharge of firearms (Attachment B). Other 9 statutes limit the extent to which counties may regulate firearms in general and the discharge of 10 firearms, particularly with respect to the discharge of firearms on "sport shooting ranges." 11 12 In examining this issue, the County Attorney determined the only lawful means to regulate the 13 discharge of firearms in urbanized areas in a manner by which the regulation would apply to 14 discharge of firearms in general and on existing shooting ranges is to regulate the discharge of 15 firearms within specified distances of high density urbanized areas. To show where such 16 regulations could be implemented, Planning Department staff developed a county map showing 17 areas of the County with residential housing densities of 10 or more residential units per 10 acres 18 (Attachment A). This map in the packet is for illustrative purposes only and shows where an 19 ordinance of this type could be applicable. Although each grid square is not visible, each red grid 20 square represents a 10-acre tract within which there are at least 10 residential units. The 21 enclosed green areas on the map are areas in which there are clusters of at least four red grid 22 squares within approximately one mile of each other. Regulated areas could be established 23 through reference to existing roads in the area or GPS coordinates with enforcement focused on 24 discharges occurring within a designated distance from a residential unit located within one of 25 the regulated areas. As is apparent from the map, focusing only on dense areas would create 26 small islands of enforcement and, at least at the density selected for the example, would result in 27 enforcement areas only in the southern portion of the County. 28 29 Durham County previously implemented an ordinance similar to this in which the ordinance only 30 applied to the discharge of firearms within 600 feet of a residence within one of many high 31 density areas. Durham also had a permit process for shooting ranges that existed in the 32 regulated areas prior to the adoption of the ordinance (Attachment C). According to the Durham 33 County Attorney, enforcement proved exceptionally difficult, and in December 2018, Durham 34 County amended its ordinance to remove the references to high density areas and now restricts 35 firearms discharge throughout the county if it occurs within 900 feet of the property lines of 36 properties containing houses, schools, and churches (Attachment D). 37 38 The County Attorney consulted the Orange County Sheriff's Office on this issue and, as in prior 39 discussions of this topic, the Sheriff's Office indicates enforcement would be difficult due to the 40 nature of the regulated activities, that being generally short in duration and, unless visually 41 observed by a deputy, difficult to precisely locate. 42 43 Pursuant to North Carolina law, any regulation such as that discussed in this presentation would 44 not apply to the discharge of firearms for lawful hunting activities, when occurring in the defense 45 of person or property, or pursuant to the lawful directions of law enforcement officers. 46 47 John Roberts said this presentation is not a recommendation, but rather some ideas for 48 the Board to consider. He said a lot more work would need to be done, should the Board choose 49 to pursue an ordinance. 50 John Roberts said residents voiced great concern about constitutional rights being 51 infringed upon. He said that is not the case, and any of the rights in the Bill of Rights may be