Browse
Search
Agenda 09-17-19 Item 6-a - Refund Request from John C. and Judith K. Guibert, Lake Orange Property
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
Agenda - 09-17-19 Regular Meeting
>
Agenda 09-17-19 Item 6-a - Refund Request from John C. and Judith K. Guibert, Lake Orange Property
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2019 4:12:14 PM
Creation date
9/12/2019 3:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/17/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 09-17-19 Regular Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2019\Agenda - 09-17-19 Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> • Property ownership in North Carolina is deed document based, and taxing jurisdictions <br /> do not have the authority to change the property lines or the size of a property without a <br /> legal document being recorded that indicates the change in acreage or property lines. <br /> Tax records are based on the recorded document, and cannot be changed without a new <br /> recorded document. <br /> • Pursuant to NC Statute 105-381, a refund may be made for the prior five years if it is <br /> based on a clerical error made by the County, or due to an illegal tax. Because the issue <br /> in this situation is created by the surveys and deeds that do not clearly define ownership, <br /> it is not a clerical error on the part of the County. In addition, because the ownership is <br /> not clearly defined, the County cannot determine if this is an issue of double taxation <br /> (which would be an illegal tax). <br /> • Overlappage Issue — Both the Guibert prior survey and the surveys of Lake Orange Inc. <br /> make claim to the same area of property (the area between the 615' and the 620' contour <br /> lines). This is creates an overlappage issue. As in every overlappage situation, the issue <br /> must be resolved between the owners involved, in this case the Guiberts and Lake <br /> Orange, Inc. The issue may be settled between the parties through a newly recorded <br /> survey, deed, or a judgement from a court. Mr. Guibert has recorded a new survey, and <br /> the issue has been settled for future tax years. <br /> • Other landowners at Lake Orange in this same situation should use the same method to <br /> solve their overlappage issue by obtaining a new survey. After a new survey has been <br /> recorded for the properties, then adjustments to size and property lines will be made by <br /> Orange County Tax staff in accordance with the updated survey, and any resulting <br /> reduction in value will be effective for January 1 of the year following the recording of the <br /> survey. <br /> • In order to be equitable, the County must require that all Lake Orange land owners are <br /> treated the same, and follow the statutes regarding land ownership as all other Orange <br /> County property owners. Standard procedure by Tax Office staff when contacted for <br /> assistance is to advise the taxpayer to seek legal guidance and ultimately to record a <br /> new survey. It is expressed that the County must tax property owners according to <br /> recorded documents, and is not able to change what a property owner's tax is based on <br /> on without a new survey. <br /> • It is important to recognize that approximately half of the current Lake Orange Land <br /> owners have already taken the appropriate steps to establish the correct ownership of the <br /> Lake Orange property. <br /> • It is significant to realize that overlappage issues are not restricted to just the Lake <br /> Orange area. Other land owners in the County have had situations that required a new <br /> deed or survey to establish ownership and update tax records. During the June 4'" Board <br /> meeting, County Attorney John Roberts pointed out that if the issue with the Guibert <br /> property is one of double taxation, then the Guiberts should be eligible for a refund. If the <br /> issue were not determined as double taxation, the Board would be at risk of personal <br /> liability to anyone in the County who challenged it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.