Browse
Search
Planning Board minutes 040319
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
Planning Board minutes 040319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2019 3:29:13 PM
Creation date
9/10/2019 3:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 5/1/19 <br />AGENDA ITEM 6: PUBLIC CHARGE52 <br />Chair Lydia Wegman read the Public Charge53 <br />54 <br />AGENDA ITEM 7: CHAIR COMMENTS55 <br />There were none56 <br />57 <br />AGENDA ITEM 8: MAJOR SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW -To review and take action on a Concept Plan 58 <br />application for a Major Subdivision called Fairway Hills. The proposal is for a 20 lot single-family Flexible 59 <br />Development subdivision on 41.97 acres (PINs 9884-32-3275 and 9884-31-9874) located in Eno Township on the 60 <br />north side of US Highway 70 across from Occoneechee Golf Club.61 <br />PRESENTER:Patrick Mallett, Planner II62 <br />63 <br />Patrick Mallett reviewed the case history and changes since the original application, presented a PowerPoint 64 <br />presentation and reviewed the abstract including attachments.65 <br />66 <br />The project, originally proposed as a 27 lot Class A Special Use Permit Major Subdivision project, had been revised 67 <br />by the applicant. Now, Fairway Hills is proposed to be a 20 lot Flexible Development Cluster Major Subdivision. As 68 <br />a result, the review of the project would follow standards established within Section 2.15 of the UDO rather than the 69 <br />Special Use Permit process as contained in Section 2.7. Further, the applicant was no longer required to abide by 70 <br />standards contained in Section 5.17.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance as the project is no longer classified as 71 <br />requiring a Special Use Permit. The applicant was still obligated, however, to demonstrate compliance with the72 <br />provisions of Article 7 of the UDO, which establishes the development standards for subdivision projects.73 <br />74 <br />The proposal will still involve creation of individual single-family residential lots for future development, proposed to 75 <br />be served by roadways constructed to applicable NC Department of Transportation guidelines. The proposed lots 76 <br />range in size from 42,785 square feet (smallest) to 125,765 square feet (largest). The Gross density is one dwelling 77 <br />unit per 2.1 acres, which is consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan land use designations and the Lower Eno 78 <br />Protected Watershed Protection Overlay district. The applicant was proposing the creation of approximately 37% of 79 <br />open space area, which will be managed by a local homeowners association. 80 <br />81 <br />The applicant is proposing to serve the project with individual wells and for septic systems developed on each lot. 82 <br />The Concept Plan denotes anticipated areas for septic sites. The applicant has also conducted more detailed well 83 <br />and septic analysis and submitted documents as part of their application. 84 <br />85 <br />Overall drainage will be engineered according to applicable standards at the time of permit application for 86 <br />construction. The property is subject to adopted erosion control and stormwater management guidelines. The 87 <br />Concept Plan currently anticipates improving drainage using mostly Common Open Space Areas.88 <br />89 <br />The Concept Plan denotes a 75 foot wide Type E natural/constructed landscape buffer along US Highway 70 East. 90 <br />This area will be planted with additional materials and landscaped (e.g. berms/fencing) to augment preserved 91 <br />existing vegetation. The 75 foot buffer will meet the required Type E Buffer, as outlined in Section 6.8.6(F) of the 92 <br />UDO. The applicant has proposed a 50 foot perimeter well and septic setback and a 100 foot building setback, which 93 <br />would limit structures, clearing and utilities along the perimeter and US Highway 70 East. 94 <br />95 <br />Tim Smith of Summit Engineering presented a PowerPoint presentation and provided additional project details.96 <br />97 <br />Lydia Wegman asked Tim about the additional set-backs and about the wells and septic.98 <br />99 <br />Tim Smith confirmed that the building set-backs on US 70 would be 125 feet and 50 feet for well and septic. He also100 <br />advised that they have hired a consultant for the express purpose of studying the water and septic requirements 101 <br />needed.102
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.