Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
zs <br />1 Kirk pointed out that the Concept Plan had nine lots and the Prel3maaary Plan has eight lots. ?he <br />z ninth lot has been combined.,with as existing lot There am now ao its for septic <br />3 systems. <br />4 <br />s Preston said that she was pleased to see landscaping information about the buffers. She is <br />6 coacaaed that some ofthe plar~ that'axe along Sunrise Road are going to suffer and probably <br />7 die. She wishad it had been a mixed planting and not just the cypresses, She was a1s0 ~P~ <br />t that t~ landscaping was already done when the Planning Board had not yea approved the plan. <br />9 She is also concerned about the storm draihage easement that ~goea all the way through the site, <br />to - under the road, and through lot seven. Sb~e asked whet it:would actually do do lot seven, <br />11 <br />12 Facie Dod9oa, who wor]cs with Phil Post, said that tyre was only a pipe ~ the right-of- <br />13 way undo the road The easanent aarvss lot seven follows the natural drainage area through the <br />la lot. The house ao lot seven is located nest the setback lice in ardear m tsloe advatnage of suitable <br />is soils for a~grav~-ty-feed septic system. <br />16 <br />17 Barrows asked far ~Scadon on Preston's concerns about the planting. . <br />1$ <br />19 Preston made rexEe:encs to the agwda abstract and said t1:at mapka cad water oaks were nQt <br />ZO suitable to go underneaxh power lines. She: said that the planting should not be up oa a berm. <br />21 <br />~ Benedict said tbat the applicatt bead aQ approval to do the plaodng before the Playing Board and <br />33 the county Commieslonara approved the snbd~ivisia®. He said that the applicant had no vested <br />~ rights ~ g the plan until it way approved He said that the board could suggest mined <br />~ planting :clasmas a-ithout beams, and this ceutd be one of the ~ l~ approval of the <br />a6 projext. . <br />r <br />as MOTION: Prasiori moved m accept the staffs xa'nommeatdatian to a~p~prove the <br />~ meaty Plan for sunrise speiags wlth the change that the type <br />3o A buflhr along Sumiae Road is m be teca~ m be mixed <br />31 playing of small, deciduous tees cad small <br />~ a berm. 3a~ade~d by Katz. ~~ ~'' oat on <br />33 <br />34 3trsyhorn agrees wlth the ticat of the plants, but he thinks that the berms should stay <br />35 because they peovi~da privetcy. Preatou cxplsinled hav+r berms could cause the trees t4 die. <br />36 <br />37 F.raie Dodson said tb~et f31e intent of tba berms was for noise cowl bexaase of how close the <br />38 subdivision is 14 I~14: He aakad if the berms csuld stay cad thv cypresses Bald just be <br />39 i1ltCispersed with othoc trees. <br />4Q <br />al Katz asked about the responsibility of the developer in maimtaiving the buffer in the furore. <br />42 <br />. 4a F.alie Dodson said that the wan~anty peaiod wan genarally one year. ' <br />~ 4S Katz is opposed to the: beam because the planL~ would die. <br />46 <br />47 Qoodvvia said that he thinks it is micramanagiag to say that berms can or cannot be in a <br />