Browse
Search
Minutes 06-11-19 Budget Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2019
>
Minutes 06-11-19 Budget Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2019 10:06:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:32:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/11/2019
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-11-2019 Budget Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 06-11-19 Budget Work Session
Agenda 06-11-2019 - Item 1,3,4 - Discussion and Decisions of FY2019-20 Operating Budget, County Fee Schedule, and Tax Rates
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 06-11-19 Budget Work Session
Agenda 06-11-2019 - Item 2 - Discussion and Decisions of FY2019-20 Capital Investment Plan
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 06-11-19 Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> Chair Rich said this would be an additional $46 on top of$175 proposed per pupil. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he is not interested in raising money just for schools without <br /> addressing the inequities, and would not support it. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if the actual costs could be identified. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said everyone would have it added to their tax bills. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said the CHCCS would have this taken back out due to the <br /> reduction in the special district tax, and the net is that OCS residents would have additional <br /> costs. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said yes, but OCS would also have additional per pupil funds. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said he has lived in the OCS district for 40 years, and there is <br /> a widespread positivity towards the schools, but there is less wealth in the County and residents <br /> seem fine with the schools the way they are. He said Commissioner Dorosin's proposal would <br /> increase the tax rate in OCS, and the residents likely would not support this. He said he would <br /> like to know how much it would cost the OCS taxpayer in Commissioner Dorosin's proposal <br /> versus Commissioner Bedford's. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said if the increase were 1-cent, the cost would be the same. <br /> Chair Rich said it is the same. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if it would cost the same amount of money under <br /> Commissioner Bedford's plan, and said he is not sure that is true. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said Commissioner Bedford is now proposing a '/2 cent increase. <br /> He said Commissioner Bedford is proposing a County property tax rate hike, and the impact of <br /> his proposal is the same. He said the difference with his proposal is that there would be a <br /> reduction in the CHCCS special district tax, and his proposal results in an increase in the per <br /> pupil spending in OCS, while the CHCCS per pupil remains constant. He said Commissioner <br /> Bedford's proposal keeps the disparity between the two districts, and moves it up equally. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said a .05-cent increase would be the same amount of money <br /> per pupil whether it was done as a straight increase, or whether it was done in combination with <br /> the .05-cent reduction in the CHCCS special district tax. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said it would not be exactly the same, and reiterated previously <br /> made comments. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if both proposals end up with the same amount of <br /> money per student, but one decreases the CHCCS special tax and one increases the OCS tax. <br /> Chair Rich said no. <br /> Chair Rich said there are two options before the Board: Commissioner Bedford or <br /> Commissioner McKee's proposal. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he would not make a motion, out of respect for <br /> Commissioner Bedford's amendment. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Bedford to increase by '/2 cent Ad valorem tax to <br /> go to the schools. <br /> NO SECOND <br /> MOTION FAILS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Marcoplos to <br /> transfer $250 000 from the OPED line item to the ADM schools. <br /> Commissioner Greene asked if the more senior members of the Board have thoughts <br /> about OPED. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.