Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-26-2001-c5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 02-26-2001
>
Agenda - 02-26-2001-c5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 9:07:33 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:29:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/26/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c5
Document Relationships
Minutes - 02-26-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`~. <br />4~ ~ ~~ <br />ARTICLE 8.$.23 SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS <br />Article $.8.23 indicates that the application shall comply with the applicable sections of Article 7 -Planned bevelopments <br />ARTICLE 7 -SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS <br />("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non-compliance) <br />Ordinance Requirements <br />Article 7.4 indicates the <br />application must first comply <br />with all requirements specified <br />in Article 20 -Amendments. <br />Those requirements include: <br />20.3.2 a) Map showing <br />affected property at scale of <br />not less than 1 " = 7 00' <br />PLANNING STAFF EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS <br />Yes x No <br />N/A Yes No <br />N/A Yes No <br />Site plan provided at a scale <br />of 1 " - 400'. Adequate fior <br />Master Plan. Site plans to be <br />submitted for each parcel. <br />N/A - No text amendment <br />proposed. <br /> <br />PLANNING BOARD <br />FINDINGS <br />Yes No <br />Yes No <br />Yes No <br />Yes No <br />20.3.2 b) For amendments to <br />zoning text, a copy of existing <br />text provisions and a written <br />statement in detail of <br />proposed changes. <br />20.3.2 c) Explanation of <br />alleged error, if any, to be <br />corrected by proposed <br />amendment <br />20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, <br />if any, which make Zoning <br />Atlas amendment reasonably <br />necessary to promote public <br />health, safety and general <br />welfare <br />20.3.2 e) Manner in which <br />proposed Zoning Atlas <br />amendment will carry out <br />purpose and intent of adopted <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />20.3.2 f) A traffic impact <br />study as required by Article <br />13. <br />N/A - No. error alleged. <br />x Yes No Application indicates water <br />and sewer has been <br />extended to the site, a new <br />school has been constructed, <br />and road improvements have <br />and will be made. <br />x Yes No This type of proposal <br />provides a more versatile <br />environmentally friendly <br />development with the <br />disturbed area minimized and <br />open space maximized. Also, <br />the impact of the mixed-use <br />development can be <br />controlled through the <br />Special Use Permit process <br />whereas a straight single- <br />. family development can <br />proceed under general <br />guidelines. Also, the <br />development is following the <br />concepts set forth in the <br />village option of the flexible <br />development standards. <br />x Yes No A traffic impact study has <br />been submitted. <br />Yes No <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.