Agenda - 02-20-2001-9f - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

26 i Kirk pointed. out that the Concept Plan had nine lots and the Preliminary Plan has eight lots. The 2 ninth lot has been combined.,with an existing lot. There are now no easements for septic 3 syst=s. 4 s Preston add that she was pleased to see landscaping information about the buffers. She is 6 concerned that some of the plants that are along Sunrise Road are going to suffer and probably 7 die. She wished it had been a mixed planting and not just the cypresses. She was also surprised s that the landscaping was already done when the Planning Board had not yet approved the plan, 9 She is also concerned about the storm drainage easement that goes all the way through the site, 10 under the road, and through lot seven. She asked what it would actually do to lot sev= I1 12 Emig Dodson, who works with Phil Post, said that there was only a pipe undawath the right-of- 13 way under the road. The easement across lot seven follows the n= W drainage area through the 14 lot. The house on lot seven is located near the setback line in order to take advantage of suitable is soils for a•8ravity-feed septic system. 16 . 17 Barrows asked for clarification, on Preston's concerns about the planting. 18 19 Preston made rdaenoe to the agenda abstract and said that maples and water oaks ware not 20 suitable to go underneath power lines. She said that the planting should not be up on a berm. 21 22 Benedict said that the applicant had no approval to do the pla n6g bore the Plammiag Board and 23 the County Commisdoners approved the subdivision. He said that the applicant had no vented 24 rights of continuing the plan until it was approved. He said that the board could suggest mixed 25 planting schemes without berms, and this could be one of the conditions for approval of the 26 project. 27 28 MOTION: Preston moved to accept the staffs reconuaen116M to approve the 29 Preliminary Plan for Sunrise Springs with the change that the type 30 A buffer along Sunrise Road is to be reconstructed to be mixed 31 planting of small, deciduous trees and small evergreen trees, not on, 32 a berm. Seconded by Katz 33 3n, ' Strayhorn agrees with the composition of the plants, but he thinks that the berms should stay 35 because they provide privacy. presto explained how berms could cause the trees to die. 36 37 Ernie Dodsm mid that the intent of the berms was for noise control beemne of how close the 38 subdivision is tD 140: He asked if the berms could stay and the cypmsses could just be 39 interspersed with other trees. 40 41 Katz asked about the responsibility of the developer in maintaining the buffer in the fiAm. 42 43 Ernie Dodson, said that the wavanty period was generally one year. 44 . 4s Katz is opposed to the berm because the plants would die. 46 47 Goodwin said that he thinks it is micromaYlastins to say that berms can or cannot be in a