Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
'DocuSi n Envelope ID:49DCCCCF-BDED-4EDB-A3D5-579B6C96F48E <br /> recently Chaired the American Planning Association's Paying for Growth Task Force. He was also <br /> recently named an Affiliate of the National Center for Smart Growth Research & Education. <br /> EDUCATION <br /> M.B.A., Economics, Shenandoah University <br /> B.S., Geography/Urban Planning, East Tennessee State University <br /> B.S., Political Science/Urban Studies, East Tennessee State University <br /> SELECTED FISCAL/ECONOMIC ANALYSIS EXPERIENCE <br /> ■ Anchorage, Alaska—Fiscal Impact Analysis of General Plan Alternatives <br /> ■ Matsu Borough, Alaska—Fiscal Impact Analysis <br /> ■ Sahuarita, Arizona—Fiscal Impact Model <br /> ■ Clovis, California—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Annexation Alternatives <br /> ■ Napa County, California—Fiscal Equity Study <br /> ■ Pasadena, California— Cost of Land Uses Fiscal and Economic Analysis <br /> ■ Aurora, Colorado—Feasibility Study of City-County Formation <br /> ■ Mesa County, Colorado—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios <br /> ■ Louisville, Colorado—Fiscal Impact Model <br /> ■ Westminster, Colorado—Fiscal Impact Model <br /> ■ Windsor, Connecticut—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Great Pond Village <br /> ■ Kissimmee, Florida—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Annexation Areas <br /> ■ Hernando County, Florida—Fiscal Impact Analysis <br /> ■ Hillsborough County, Florida—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Current Land Use Trend <br /> ■ Manatee County, Florida—How Will We Grow?Funding Strategies <br /> ■ Miami-Dade County, Florida—Fiscal and Economic Analysis of Rural and Agricultural Areas <br /> ■ Sarasota County, Florida—Fiscal and Economic Analysis of Development Prototypes <br /> ■ Champaign, Illinois—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Two Growth Scenarios <br /> ■ Lawrence, Kansas—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios; Cost of Land Uses Study <br /> ■ Shreveport Metropolitan Planning Commission of Caddo Parish, Louisiana — Fiscal and Economic <br /> Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios <br /> ■ Carroll County, Maryland —Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios <br /> ■ Howard County, Maryland —Fiscal Impact Analysis of General Plan <br /> ■ Prince George's County, Maryland—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios <br /> ■ Coon Rapids, Minnesota—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios (Metro Council Study) <br /> ■ Cottage Grove, Minnesota—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios (Metro Council Study) <br /> ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios (Metro Council Study) <br /> ■ St. Paul, Minnesota—Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios (Metro Council Study) <br /> ■ State of Minnesota—Fiscal Disparities Program Study <br /> ■ Gallatin Canyon/Big Sky, Montana—Review and Update of CIP/Infrastructure Finance Options <br /> ■ Salem, New Hampshire—Fiscal Impact Model <br /> ■ West Windsor, New Jersey—Fiscal Impact Analysis of T.O.D. Project and TIF Analysis <br /> ■ Edison, New Jersey—Fiscal Impact Analysis of T.O.D. Project and TIF Analysis <br /> ■ Wilson, North Carolina— Cost of Land Use Analysis and Revenue Strategies <br /> TischlerBise 15 <br /> :ISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLONNmG <br />