Orange County NC Website
Zb <br />However, with the exception of water main construction costs, no formal decision has been made as to: <br />a) which, if any, of the remaining costs will be financed by public funds; b) what level of funding will be <br />provided; c) how those funds will be allocated among homeowners, landlords, economically <br />disadvantaged households, etc.; or d) what the sources of funds will be. <br />OWASA's availability fees must be paid for each home or structure that is connected to the water main <br />system. Fora residential unit, this fee is typically calculated on the basis of the square footage of the <br />dwelling. Availability fees in-the Rogers Road community are expected to average approximately $900 <br />per unit. Insofar as the Rogers Road project is concerned, a case may be made that availability fee costs <br />should be treated like water main construction costs and financed with landfill funds. That argument <br />maybe outlined as follows: <br />1) municipal water service is required to ensure that all household can avoid exposure to drinking <br />water contaminated with landfill leachate; <br />2) water mains must be constructed in the neighborhood to make water service available; <br />3) availability fees must be paid before homes or buildings can be connected to the water mains; and <br />4) accordingly, all availability fees should be financed in the same manner as the construction costs. <br />That is, the landfill funds may and should be used to pay availability fees for all occupied homes <br />within the Rogers Road community. <br />The extension of municipal water service to the Rogers.Road community will naturally increase the <br />value of all of the properties to which that service is available. However, on several occasions the Board <br />of County Commissioners has expressed its intent that the County's funding of water service to the <br />Rogers Road community not unnecessarily enhance the revenue generating potential of non-owner <br />occupied or development property. While all costs funded from the landfillfunds must be made <br />available for all homes,existing at the time the funds are expended, costs that are funded from other <br />sources maybe allocated more selectively. <br />One financing strategy or process that the BOCC could consider using (and that would be familiar to the <br />Board) to finance much of the remaining costs of providing water service to the Rogers Road community <br />is very similar to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) process. Historically in Orange <br />County, CDBG projects have been used to fiord utility service extensions and home improvements for <br />low and moderate-income households. The typical CDBG process of identifying home improvement <br />needs as well as determining whether households meet low and moderate income criteria could be easily <br />adapted to determine which structures in the Rogers Road community need internal plumbing <br />improvements and which households should receive public-assistance for constructing service lines and <br />plumbing upgrades. :. <br />Unfortunately, the Rogers Road project is not a candidate for CDBG funds. However, Orange.County.- <br />could self fund a grant, deriving. necessary funds from the General Fund, local sales tax receipts. or some <br />other funding source. Once a fixed total funding limit is established, the Orange County Department of <br />Housing and Community Development could target and disperse those funds exactly as it would for a . <br />HUD funded CDBG project. Since the water main construction will not be complete prior to June 2001, <br />funds for this grant could be appropriated as a part of the FY 2001-2002 budget process. <br />The original survey of the Rogers Road community in the fall of 1998 identified 119 properties which <br />might be considered as apart of the community. Ultimately, five properties (parcel numbers 30, 115, <br />116, 117 and 118 on the map attached with the 1999 Rogers Road report and survey spreadsheet) were