Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br /> <br /> Attachment 3 1 <br /> 2 <br />DRAFT 3 <br />MINUTES 4 <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 5 <br />BUDGET WORK SESSION 6 <br />May 30, 2019 7 <br />7:00 p.m. 8 <br /> 9 <br />The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Thursday, May 30, 10 <br />2019 at 7:00 p.m. at the Southern Human Services Center in Chapel Hill, N.C. 11 <br /> 12 <br />COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Penny Rich and Commissioners 13 <br />Jamezetta Bedford, Mark Dorosin, Sally Greene, Earl McKee, Mark Marcoplos and Renee 14 <br />Price 15 <br />COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None 16 <br />COUNTY ATTORNEYS PRESENT: John Roberts 17 <br />COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Bonnie Hammersley, Deputy County 18 <br />Manager Travis Myren, and Clerk to the Board Donna Baker (All other staff members will 19 <br />be identified appropriately below) 20 <br /> 21 <br />Chair Rich called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 22 <br />Travis Myren reviewed the following items at the Commissioners’ places: 23 <br /> 24 <br />- Blue sheet: a listing of the draft amendments to the budget from Commissioners staff has 25 <br />received so far. This is a living document that will be amended throughout the budget process. 26 <br />- White sheet: sent out this last week, and contains answers to questions that were raised 27 <br />during the CIP Discussion: 28 <br /> 29 <br />1. Prioritization of Facility Projects 30 <br />The facility repair and improvement projects were scored based on consistent scoring 31 <br />criteria described in the attachment. In general, projects intended to address known 32 <br />failures or facility deficiencies that pose significant risk are scored above preventative 33 <br />maintenance items. 34 <br /> 35 <br />2. Prioritization of the Parks Facility and Renovation Project 36 <br />Individual elements of the Parks Facility Repair and Renovation Project were scored 37 <br />using the facility scoring criteria. We did not attempt to score the other parks projects 38 <br />such as improvements to Cedar Grove Park or continued investment in the Mountains to 39 <br />Sea Trail. Each of those projects has its own intrinsic value and purpose, so they are 40 <br />not easily prioritized against one another. 41 <br /> 42 <br />3. HVAC Recommendations 43 <br />This list is an inventory of the HVAC systems recommended for replacement along with 44 <br />an explanation of each system’s current status and age. New units are listed separately 45 <br />with a justification for their addition. 46 <br /> 47 <br />4. Reponses to CIP Questions 48 <br />This memo responds to specific questions raised by the Board during the CIP work 49 <br />session. It addresses the cost and benefit of geothermal systems, building envelope 50