Orange County NC Website
DRAFT 20 <br /> EXCERPT MEETING MINUTES <br /> ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> MAY 1,2019 <br /> REGULAR MEETING <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT: David Blankfard (Vice-Chair), Hillsborough Township Representative; Hunter Spitzer,At-Large; <br /> Jessica Aguilar; At-Large; Hathaway Pendergrass, At-Large; Susan Hunter, Chapel Hill Township Representative; <br /> Adam Beeman, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Patricia Roberts, Cheeks Township Representative; Randy <br /> Marshall, Bingham Township Representative; Melissa Poole, Little River Township Representative; Kim Piracci, Eno <br /> Township Representative; <br /> MEMBERS ABSENT: Carrie Fletcher, Bingham Township Representative; Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large Chapel Hill <br /> Township Representative; <br /> STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning & Inspections Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Pat <br /> Mallett, Planner II; Tina Love,Administrative Assistant III <br /> OTHERS PRESENT: Tim Smith, Summit Engineering; Stan Lawton; Property Owner; Jim Parker, Owner-Developer; <br /> Mark O'Neal, Pickett-Sprouse; Cyrus Griswold, Linda Nathansen, Jim & Donna Ray, Zelda Lockhart; Alois & Kim <br /> Callemyn <br /> AGENDA ITEM 7: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT(GENERAL USE REZONING)—To review and make a recommendation on <br /> an owner initiated application seeking to rezone 4.08 acres of property (PIN 9758-42-4098) located in Bingham <br /> Township on the south side of Old Greensboro Road from Rural Buffer (RB) (2.65 acres) and Existing Commercial <br /> (EC-5) (1.43 acres) to Existing Commercial (EC-5) (4.08 acres). The purpose of the rezoning is to resolve a split <br /> zoning by applying one zoning district to the entire parcel on which an existing commercial use is located. <br /> PRESENTER: Patrick Mallett, Planner II <br /> Patrick Mallett: Welcome new members;welcome old members. I am the staff person that will be presenting items 7 <br /> and 8 tonight. The first one is a general use zoning case. In your packet, you've got an abstract which starts on <br /> page 11 of your packet. It goes through some of the basic information and includes five attachments; the application, <br /> map of the subject parcel, the zoning exhibit showing any existing conditions of the property, the Statement of <br /> Consistency, and then the ordinance amending and the zoning atlas with the zoning map. As I said, this is a General <br /> Use Rezoning request. The property owner is Mr. Stan Lawton who is here with Alois Callemyn a surveyor and his <br /> wife, Kim. The subject property is Lawton Storage. As you can see from this photo, the issue at hand is that the <br /> commercial zoning goes right through the existing building, and the building has been operating as a storage facility <br /> since 1977. What the applicant is seeking to do is to take the 2.65 acres of Rural Buffer zoning and rezone the entire <br /> parcel as Existing Commercial (EC-5). It's all within the University Lake Watershed and would all remain within that <br /> watershed. So, 4.08 the existing parcel size is proposed to be rezoned to existing commercial. The summary is that <br /> most of you were not on the Planning Board at the time, but in 2016 the Board of Commissioners directed staff to <br /> take a comprehensive look at not just this township and others and evaluate look at properties that had zoning <br /> issues, namely split zoning. This was one of those cases. At that time, Mr. Lawton wanted to stop and consider his <br /> long-term goals and figure out what he wanted to do regarding the implications for the property and the business he's <br /> been operating since 1977. So, we pulled his case out of that stack. Since that time, he's decided to proceed with <br /> what the staff was recommending in 2016 which was to rezone the entire existing parcel to EC-5. Zoning in Orange <br /> County rotated around various Townships and Bingham zoned for the first time in 1981. His storage business, the <br /> proceeding woodworking, and truss operation well preceded the original zoning in this township. The policy at that <br /> time was quite literal, and I think it was a common practice to draw a line around a building that was non-residential <br /> use and leave the remainder to a residential zoning category. That's created a number of issues namely conformity, <br /> the ability to meet the landscape requirements, and a series of other things. Our recommendation is that you review <br /> the amendment, deliberate on the petition, consider the director's recommendations and then make a <br /> recommendation for the Board of Commissioners for their June 4th meeting. <br />