Orange County NC Website
ATTACHMENT B <br /> LOCAL FUNDS <br /> The nearly century-old division of state and local responsibility LOCAL SCHOOL FUNDING: <br /> for school funding still shapes the way North Carolina pays for IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS <br /> public education today, with approximately 65 percent of AND CLASSROOMS <br /> instructional expenditures coming from the state and 97 <br /> percent of capital expenses paid at the local level. However, <br /> the division has eroded somewhat over the past 5 to 10 years, Differences in the ability of • to invest in <br /> with counties funding approximately 15 percent of principal their schoolinto dramatically <br /> and assistant principal positions, 6.7 percent of teachers, 9 different options at the sch•• and classroom <br /> percent of teacher assistants, and 20.2 percent of professional As an illustration, •' average class size <br /> instructional support personnel; and with the state paying 3 of • students per •• counties <br /> percent of capital expenses. spend the mostper ''nt would spend,on <br /> average,$63,996 per classroom. By contrast,the <br /> When examining local expenditures on programs and ten counties .- • the least per • would <br /> personnel, in 2016-17 the ten counties that spent the most per spend, . .•- $15,096 .- .. <br /> student averaged $3,200 per student compared to the ten that difference . : ••• per classroom. <br /> spent the least, which averaged $755 per student. That average elementary school - of 490 students, <br /> represents a gap of $2,445 between the top and lowest that translates to . • - of$1,198,054 .- <br /> spending districts. Of North Carolina's 100 counties, 59 fall elementary •• average • <br /> below the state average of$1,652 in funding for school .. - • . . difference . <br /> personnel. Orange County alone spent $396 more than the • .: .- . ..translates <br /> seven lowest-spending counties combined. These statistics <br /> continue the trend of increased responsibility being placed on <br /> counties to fund instructional expenditures as well as capital <br /> outlays. This increased responsibility has resulted in FUNDING FOR SCHOOL BUILDINGS, 2016-17 <br /> exasperated inequities already experienced by students of <br /> low-wealth counties. <br /> STATE <br /> One of the primary challenges from the five low-wealth $40 MILLION <br /> plaintiffs in the Leandro case dealt with the inequities (3%) <br /> between varying levels of county support for schools. <br /> However, the state Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that "the <br /> 'equal opportunities' clause of Article IX, Section 2(1) of the <br /> North Carolina Constitution does not require substantially <br /> equal funding or educational advantages in all school <br /> districts. Consequently, the provisions of the current state LOCAL <br /> system for funding schools which require or allow counties to $1.1 BILLION <br /> help finance their school systems and result in unequal <br /> funding among the school districts of the state do not violate Lill _��A <br /> constitutional principles." <br /> Source:North Carolina Department of Public Instruction,Statistical Profile. <br /> �Jw <br /> i <br /> t <br /> 7 � w <br /> -All� <br /> 9< <br />