Browse
Search
Agenda Item 1-B - Public School Forum Local School Finance Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
Agenda - 05-23-19 Budget Work Session
>
Agenda Item 1-B - Public School Forum Local School Finance Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2019 5:45:31 PM
Creation date
5/16/2019 5:32:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Agenda - May 23, 2019 Budget Work Session - Schools and Outside Agencies
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2019\Agenda - 05-23-19 Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B <br /> > LOCAL SCHOOL FINANCE STUDY 2019: GAPS AND TRENDS <br /> The primary source of revenue for county government is local ............................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> property taxes.This year, our study once again revealed wide WIDENING REAL ESTATE WEALTH GAP <br /> variation between the property values and revenues generated <br /> between the state's wealthiest and poorest counties.This year <br /> also saw the continuation of marked differences in spending per <br /> child across districts. <br /> 2,500,000 <br /> POOREST COUNTIES TAXED THEMSELVES AT <br /> HIGHER RATES WHILE STILL GENERATING <br /> SUBSTANTIALLY LESS REVENUE FOR EDUCATION 2,000,000 <br /> The ten poorest counties taxed themselves at nearly double <br /> the rate of the ten wealthiest counties- $0.81 compared to 1,500,000 <br /> $0.44, a 37-cent difference. Despite having higher tax rates <br /> than wealthier districts,the revenue the poorest counties could <br /> generate was still substantially lower than that of wealthier 1,000,000 <br /> counties.The poorest counties have raised their tax rates,while <br /> wealthiest counties have been able to lower theirs, and yet the <br /> substantial revenue disparity persists. 500,000 <br /> In 2016-2017,the taxable real estate gap between the top and <br /> bottom ten districts was $1.49 million.This discrepancy has <br /> decreased somewhat in the past several years,after peaking <br /> at $1.69 million in 2012-13, following many years of rapidly �o �a��0°00°00 Doti°o�ooaoo`�oo°°o^oo�oo°°.° 01 ti 01�OHO°O�O ti°p <br /> , ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti <br /> increasing wealth inequality. Major factors that contributed to <br /> the narrowing gap included reductions in real estate wealth in <br /> the wealthiest counties, some counties'2011 revaluations, and The difference in real estate wealth capacity between the ten wealthiest <br /> increases in student enrollment in several counties. Still, as and ten poorest counties has grown from$477,477 in 1997 to$1,498,804 in <br /> shown in the graph below,the gap is much more substantial 2017.(See Table 1) <br /> than in earlier years, resulting in widening inequality in the <br /> ability of districts to fund schools to adequately serve their <br /> students' needs. <br /> DISPARITIES IN REAL ESTATE WEALTH PER ADM <br /> '1 <br /> TOP QUARTILE <br /> SECOND QUARTILE <br /> THIRD QUARTILE <br /> BOTTOM QUARTILE <br /> >10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.