Browse
Search
CFE minutes 111218
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
CFE minutes 111218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2019 3:43:58 PM
Creation date
4/17/2019 3:43:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/12/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 <br /> <br />potential environmental impact. Stancil stressed that the evaluation needs to be <br />concise to fit within the two page agenda item abstract. Bouma reviewed <br />attachment 5 and explained that the CFE needs to come up with a model <br />example, a few sentences for BOCC abstracts, five or six environmental impact <br />measures, and a short narrative explaining the measures. Bouma suggested <br />that it should be in open response format, thematic or qualitative in nature, and <br />usable for the layperson. <br />Crook suggested that there could be a liaison for each department who is trained <br />in environmental impacts. This liaison could then serve as the support staff for <br />each agenda abstract drafter in the corresponding department. The CFE could <br />train the liaisons and serve as support for that staff person. <br />Stancil suggested that the template prompt could say “further the environmental <br />goal by…” as to not create a list that could be cut and pasted to the agenda <br />abstract, which BOCC has said they do not want. <br />Saul suggested that an item could have a negative impact. He further suggested <br />that a checklist could be used as a first cut that follows with a more informative <br />narrative. Gronback offered that she liked a decision tree approach. Eichel <br />suggested that the agenda abstract could have a referendum references of more <br />information was needed. Marzuola stated that he liked Attachment B of the <br />agenda Attachment 5 because it provided the most useful information. <br />Bouma suggested the CFE review a draft of the environmental impacts at the <br />December meeting. Bouma will run test with the draft environmental impacts <br />with sample agenda items. <br />VI. SOE 2019 Update <br />Staff led a discussion concerning the updated SOE timeline, event planning and <br />possible partners, and in-house graphics capabilities. <br />Gronback and Fletcher agreed to be on the SOE events committee. Livingston <br />explained that the SOE rollout event could possibly be in collaboration with other <br />entities such as Triangle Land Conservancy, Eno River Association, and the <br />Eno-New Hope Conservation Collaborative. The event could go beyond the <br />SOE and include such things as the Eno-New Hope Landscape Corridor Plan. <br />Livingston described the types of graphics Orange County could provide for the <br />SOE report which includes a printed booklet, infographics, and brochure. <br />Multiple CFE members expressed their interest in wanting the SOE to be an <br />interactive webpage with imbedded links to more content rather than printed <br />materials. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.