Browse
Search
Planning Board agenda 040319
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
Planning Board agenda 040319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2019 5:18:27 PM
Creation date
4/15/2019 5:17:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D R A F T <br />2) To have staff include additional opportunities for retreat centers in commercial districts. 503 <br />504 <br />Lydia Wegman stated she would second.505 <br />506 <br />Carrie Fletcher asked if that would finalize everything Mr. Harvey needed. Mr. Harvey agreed, but then responded that 507 <br />it would depend on the board’s comfort with the attorney’s response.508 <br />509 <br />Lydia Wegman commented that they trusted Mr. Harvey would express to the attorney their discomfort with the 510 <br />language as it is. 511 <br />512 <br />Michael Harvey said he understood both the attorney’s rationale and the boards’ concerns. He stated he felt he had 513 <br />provided the best explanation he could offer but understands that they would like to have a discussion with the person 514 <br />recommending the language. 515 <br />516 <br />Lydia Wegman expressed that if the attorney feels persuaded that the language is necessary that he gives some 517 <br />further thought to expressing it more clearly so that the standard is clearer to applicants, the BOCC, and Board of 518 <br />Adjustment 519 <br />520 <br />Carrie Fletcher commented that that is the reason we have a citizen board, so citizens are represented, not just 521 <br />attorneys. 522 <br />523 <br />Alexander Gregory asked if either Mr. Harvey or Mr. Benedict foresaw any issues that could arise with the burden of 524 <br />proof or if they had heard of any issues arising from the other jurisdictions currently using the language. Mr. Harvey525 <br />replied, no, and reassured them that if he couldn’t dissuade their concerns he would provide them with an opportunity 526 <br />to have their concerns addressed. 527 <br />528 <br />Craig Benedict provided an example for the use of burden of persuasion to the board. 529 <br />530 <br />Adam Beeman expressed his disapproval with the language and found it to be unfair. He expressed that the situation 531 <br />should be binary and not at the whim of person listening to the story, nor should a person have to pay more money to 532 <br />fight their cause when they may not be financially able to do so.533 <br />534 <br />Lydia Wegman asked Mr. Harvey if there needed to be a motion and a vote.535 <br />536 <br />MOTION by Adam Beeman to adjourn this meeting until the attorney can come back and talk to us on March 20 <br />th at 537 <br />7:00 p.m. in this room on the 2nd floor of the Planning Department and to add the wedding retreat status to the 538 <br />commercial districts. 539 <br />540 <br />Lydia Wegman requested to add that the board would like an explanation from the attorney related to the burden of 541 <br />persuasion language and we would prefer to see additional language explaining what is meant if he is persuaded that 542 <br />that language is necessary. Seconded by Randy Marshall. 543 <br />VOTE:UNANIMOUS544 <br />545 <br />Tina Love asked Mr. Beeman if he accepted the addition, whereas Mr. Beeman accepted.546 <br />547 <br />AGENDA ITEM 8: ADJOURNMENT548 <br />The meeting was adjourned by consensus. 549 <br /> 550 <br /> 551 <br /> 552 <br />Lydia N. Wegman, Chair553 <br />14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.