Browse
Search
Planning Board agenda 040319
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
Planning Board agenda 040319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2019 5:18:27 PM
Creation date
4/15/2019 5:17:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D R A F T <br />Michael Harvey commented that Randy had a valid point but stated there would be larger issues involved if everything279 <br />remained in one central category. He explained it would be difficult to handle and try to make exclusions instead of just 280 <br />splitting it out. 281 <br />282 <br />Craig Benedict commented that he felt as though there was something missing in regard to someone wanting to put an 283 <br />assembly facility for retreat uses in a commercial area. He stated that this type of situation would have previously been 284 <br />captured by the general category. 285 <br />286 <br />Michael Harvey remarked that if the board wanted to add retreat center as a permitted use in any commercial district, 287 <br />they could do so and then staff could incorporate. Mr. Harvey recommended that since the board was already going to 288 <br />ask the County Attorney for direction prior to voting, that they might want to add for the staff to consider allowing retreat 289 <br />centers in commercial zoning districts as well. Mr. Benedict mentioned that they sort of had that and stated he couldn’t 290 <br />think of anything else to call it in the table.291 <br />292 <br />Michael Harvey spoke on special events and mentioned that it was split out. He explained there was now a distinction 293 <br />between rural special events and special events and stated that rural special events by definition have to happen on a 294 <br />farm. He continued to page 69 (A) through 73 and stated there were only formatting changes. He then reminded 295 <br />everyone of the provision he spoke of earlier regarding the burden of persuasion in section 5.3.2. He then moved to296 <br />page 74 which eliminates all the regulatory standards for governing how we approve dorms, fraternity, and sororities.297 <br />He stated 74 (A) had changes in formatting. He briefly spoke of the change performed on page 79 dealing with Class 298 <br />2 kennels and explained any changes that occurred. 299 <br />300 <br />Michael Harvey then guided the board to pages 79 through 83 regarding short term rentals. He said they had lumped 301 <br />everything into term short-term rentals and explained that they had eliminated all the discretionary standards of 302 <br />evaluation per the attorney’s requirements. Additionally, Mr. Harvey mentioned they had eliminated some of the 303 <br />language listed for short term rental large referencing that it had to demonstrate a compliance with parking which was 304 <br />already mandated by the ordinance. 305 <br />306 <br />Lydia Wegman, asked Mr. Harvey if he meant for rentals. Mr. Harvey replied, yes and explained that a site plan would 307 <br />have to be submitted and it would have to demonstrate compliance with the code. 308 <br />309 <br />Michael Harvey stated there has been questions raised about how this impacts Airbnb. Mr. Harvey stated that the 310 <br />current ordinance does not allow for nonhost occupied structures in the residential zoning districts. He stated, if you 311 <br />want to go through a Special Use Permit, you can technically have a non-host occupied structure, but you can’t have 312 <br />an Airbnb. Furthermore, if you don’t have a host then it’s not a short-term rental and therefore is not permitted. In 313 <br />fact, Mr. Harvey stated, it would be a nonhost occupied short-term rental which is not permitted in residential districts314 <br />and that is consistent with the current code. This does not impact the rental of a house for use as a single-family315 <br />residence. 316 <br />317 <br />Randy Marshall, does this knock down the arboretums desire to use that house as an Airbnb 318 <br />319 <br />Michael Harvey conveyed that there would still be existing impacts on the Keith Arboretum from the current code. Mr. 320 <br />Harvey said that it didn’t add any heightened level of complexity to their ability to do that and questioned whether or not 321 <br />the lease allows it to happen in the first place. 322 <br />323 <br />Randy Marshall sought clarification on whether they were proposing that would be an Airbnb without a host.324 <br />325 <br />Michael Harvey confirmed and stated that this knocks that down but commented that he would argue it already 326 <br />knocked down under the current code. 327 <br />328 <br />Patricia Roberts questioned the time difference between renting a single-family home versus being an Airbnb. Mr. 329 <br />Harvey responded that both short term rental small and large talk about rental by the week. He stated they were not 330 <br />likely to get into the policing business to find out how long occupants have rented if onsite and further stated the 331 <br />problem usually arises when the occupant is not home.332 <br />333 <br />Paul Guthrie asked about faculty renting out when they go on a sabbatical somewhere. 334 <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.