Browse
Search
Planning Board minutes 030619
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
Planning Board minutes 030619
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2019 5:08:28 PM
Creation date
4/15/2019 5:08:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 4/3/19 <br /> 335 <br />Michael Harvey responded this would be the rental of a house as a single-family residence. He then mentioned the 336 <br />facts table provided in the packet. He commented that the goal was not to prevent the rental of housing for use as 337 <br />housing. The goal would be to prevent the conversion of a residence into a mini hotel in an established neighborhood. 338 <br /> 339 <br />Michael Harvey continued on the amendments and guided the board to pages 83, 84, 99 and explained those to be 340 <br />just formatting updates. He stated page 100 to be the move of retreat center standards to eliminating retreat as a 341 <br />camp and explained that page 104 deals with theater as it gets moved to assembly. Mr. Harvey stated that page 145 342 <br />describes the assembly uses; the general use standard, setback standards, the size limitations. Then, he moved to 343 <br />page 153 to touch on the retreat center standards in terms of submittal and SUP requirements and explained that the 344 <br />new section 5.18.4. concerning rural special events was not changed. The term theater had now been added, since it 345 <br />was moved from recreation. 346 <br /> 347 <br />Lydia Wegman asked Mr. Harvey if retreat center remained the same. Mr. Harvey replied, yes, but stated with one 348 <br />notable exception; the deletion of camp sites. In the standards of evaluation for both, he stated there was a standard 349 <br />of evaluation involving a site plan requirement which is why it was moved to submittal requirements for both camp and 350 <br />retreat. Mr. Harvey also conveyed that the subdivision provisions for special use permits and telecommunications 351 <br />regulations would probably be gutted as they are redundant. 352 <br /> 353 <br />Lydia Wegman sought clarification on why Mr. Harvey thought they were superfluous and asked if they were covered 354 <br />elsewhere. Mr. Harvey confirmed they were in three different sections. 355 <br /> 356 <br />Michael Harvey guided the board to page 174 and informed them that he definition of assembly use had been altered. 357 <br />He explained that since assembly has been split out and retreat center has been moved to assembly land uses, it 358 <br />would no longer be needed. 359 <br /> 360 <br />Craig Benedict questioned where wedding fits into assembly uses. Mr. Harvey replied, retreat center. 361 <br /> 362 <br />Craig Benedict commented that if weddings are retreat centers, then they needed to be in more commercial area 363 <br />locations so people can have a wedding in some sort of hall. Michael Harvey remarked that the board could make 364 <br />that recommendation. He responded to Mr. Benedict and stated he had never heard this comment from him before. 365 <br />Craig replied that it had been covered by the whole assembly uses except as listed below and stated it was permitted 366 <br />in multiple areas. 367 <br /> 368 <br />Lydia Wegman questioned whether there was anything specific about wedding venues anymore. Michael Harvey, 369 <br />replied, no, and said it was all covered under the retreat center concept. 370 <br /> 371 <br />Michael Harvey said that club or lodge, was amended as relayed earlier, as was community center. He moved to page 372 <br />182 involving family care facilities and read the recommended definition. He stated that upon further consideration, the 373 <br />County Attorney decided the language should say as defined as under state statute. 374 <br /> 375 <br />Lydia Wegman questioned if that was the definition. Mr. Harvey replied, yes, and informed them that the new 376 <br />definition would now read as a facility which meets the definition of a family care home and North Carolina General 377 <br />Statute 168. Ms. Wegman inquired if state law already says this, whereas Mr. Harvey agreed. 378 <br /> 379 <br />Michael Harvey informed the board that they had already seen the definitions for group care and group facility/group 380 <br />home. He continued on to page 197 and 198 which he pointed out was the area where the place of worship definition 381 <br />that had been added. On page 199, Mr. Harvey explained a typo in the term recreation vehicle. He then spoke on the 382 <br />modifications listed on page 202 involving retreat centers and then moved to the rooming house definition previously 383 <br />discussed. On page 204, Mr. Harvey mentioned the modifications to the reference of the North Carolina Department of 384 <br />Public Instruction formerly the North Carolina Department of Education. He then proceeded to the short term rental 385 <br />and explained his reasoning for deleting the umbrella definition he had previous created. Mr. Harvey then guided the 386 <br />board to the topic of vet clinic on page 210. 387 <br /> 388 <br />Patricia Roberts asked why it would matter if the dog or cat stayed overnight. Michael Harvey answered that it would 389 <br />depend on where it is permitted in terms of what could be the ancillary impacts to adjacent property owners. 390
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.