Browse
Search
Planning Board Special Meeting minutes 032019
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
Planning Board Special Meeting minutes 032019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2019 5:06:05 PM
Creation date
4/15/2019 5:06:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/20/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 4/3/19 <br />Lydia Wegman: Where you say the applicant shall have the burden of persuasion on those issues. What issues are you 337 <br />referring to? If I’m understanding correctly James, you’re trying to say the first sentence is about the burden of production 338 <br />and the second sentence is about the burden of persuasion? 339 <br /> 340 <br />James Bryan: I don’t have it in front of me. 341 <br /> 342 <br />Lydia Wegman: When you were drawing the distinction, you were saying the burden of proof consists of the burden of 343 <br />production and the burden of persuasion. 344 <br /> 345 <br />James Bryan: I believe the first sentence was what’s currently in our UDO and what I believe is the definition of burden of 346 <br />production. 347 <br /> 348 <br />Lydia Wegman: We have this new burden of persuasion language which was not there before with reference to issues, but 349 <br />the first sentence doesn’t actually reference specific issues. 350 <br /> 351 <br />James Bryan: It should reference the standards for whatever section is applicable. 352 <br /> 353 <br />Lydia Wegman: It’s confusing for an applicant to know the issues. If we are going to keep the burden of persuasion 354 <br />language, I think it needs to be clarified. 355 <br /> 356 <br />James Bryan: It might have been a copy and paste from Durham where it should have been specified. 357 <br /> 358 <br />David Blankfard: Since burden of persuasion is a legal term that is not quite obvious to laypeople, is there a way that we 359 <br />can italicize it so people can Google “burden of persuasion” as opposed to Googling each word, because it means a whole 360 <br />host of legal implications. 361 <br /> 362 <br />James Bryan: I always recommend that ordinances be unaltered and just plain, simple rules. At 600 pages it will never be 363 <br />user friendly. What you do then is create forms and pamphlets to educate the public. I think forms like the application, a 364 <br />fill in the blank type of thing, along with pamphlets. 365 <br /> 366 <br />Kim Piracci: Does Michael have to go back and correct or improve that imperfection that you brought up? 367 <br /> 368 <br />Michael Harvey: You don’t want to know what Michael is thinking right now. 369 <br /> 370 <br />Kim Piracci: Can we call this to vote or do we have to come back for it because there’s an imperfection? 371 <br /> 372 <br />James Bryan: I would always advise against coming up with language on the spur of the moment, but if you were to say 373 <br />relevant issues I think that clarifies it. It’s one word and describes the issues. 374 <br /> 375 <br />Michael Harvey: I’m not signing off on that. I am not comfortable with that suggestion at this time. 376 <br /> 377 <br />Kim Piracci: So, we can’t vote on this tonight, anyway? 378 <br /> 379 <br />Lydia Wegman: We can vote on the language as it sits before us. 380 <br /> 381 <br />Michael Harvey: This was drafted after a 45-minute discussion between Mr. Bryan and myself to address concerns of legal 382 <br />sufficiency. 383 <br /> 384 <br />Craig Benedict: I like the brochure idea or something that explains how we implement this. If we cannot put it as a 385 <br />definition with an elaboration of it, which isn’t being suggested, then the language as it is would be useable with a 386 <br />brochure. This would explain what we are trying to achieve. 387 <br /> 388 <br />Michael Harvey: Are you going to come up with a brochure? 389 <br /> 390 <br />Lydia Wegman: The brochure also isn’t the standard of court with review. It could be helpful to applicants, but it won’t 391 <br />address the question if it were challenged. The brochure wouldn’t be admissible. 392
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.