Planning Board Special Meeting minutes 032019

Browse Search

Approved 4/3/19 Next, Section 2.10.5 Additional Criteria for Authorized Variances Special Flood Hazard Areas in addition to the criteria 504 contained within it says Section 2.10.3 that is the same reference that needs to be updated to Section 2.10.4 that is the 505 provision dealing with authorized variances. 506 507 Section 2.10.6 Modifications of the Impervious Surface Ratios in Subsection E reads that such requests may be requested 508 through one of the following provisions; through variance procedures of the Board of Adjustment as described in this 509 subsection. The subsection used to be 2.10.5 it is now re-numbered to 2.10.6. 510 511 Last, required Findings of Fact that is listed in Section 2.10.10 that is now become Section 2.10.4. 512 513 So regardless of whatever motion, whatever happens with this vote, I’d like there to be an acknowledgement and any 514 subsequent motions of those corrections as identified by staff. 515 516 Lydia Wegman: Ok, thank you 517 518 Craig Benedict: That can be incorporated by the person who made the motion and the person who seconded is in 519 agreement that can be amended. 520 521 Hunter Spitzer: I would like to amend my motion to include what Michael said. 522 523 Kim Piracci: I second that amendment. 524 525 VOTE: 4-5 526 Motion Failed 527 528 MOTION by Adam Beeman to strike burden of persuasion out of the UDO and to include the amendment made by Michael 529 Harvey relating to updating section references. Seconded by Randy Marshall. 530 531 Michael Harvey: So, your motion would be to eliminate within Section 2.10.3 the sentence “further the applicant shall have 532 the burden of persuasion on those issues” to eliminate from Section 2.11.3 Burden of Proof to eliminate “further the 533 applicant shall have the burden of persuasion on those issues” and last in Section 5.3.2 Special Use Permits “further the 534 applicant shall have the burden of persuasion on those issues”. 535 536 Adam Beeman: And to include changes as identified by staff updating references in Sections 2.10.2., 2.10.5, and 2.10.6 537 as recommended by staff. 538 539 VOTE: 7-1 540 Motion Passed with Hunter Spitzer abstaining from the vote. 541 542 Staff note: Abstaining from a vote is not an option the County’s advisory board policy allows but where a member has a 543 conflict of interest the member may be excused by majority vote of the advisory board. 544 545 Kim Piracci: Did I understand you to say you didn’t want to put it in either? 546 547 Michael Harvey: No ma’am. 548 549 Lydia Wegman: He was persuaded by his conversation with James is what I understood and it was something that made 550 sense to him. 551 552 AGENDA ITEM 5: ADJOURNMENT 553 The meeting was adjourned by consensus 554 555 556 Lydia N. Wegman, Chair 557