Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
5 <br /> Attachment 1 <br /> STAFF GUIDE TO REPLACEMENT PAGES—WHAT IS BEING CHANGES AND WHY <br /> PAGE BEING MODIFIED WHAT HAS CHANGED WHY <br /> Page 15 of agenda packet New Section 2.10.3 entitled County Attorney was concerned <br /> 'Burden of Proof over the legal sufficiency of UDO <br /> (Page 2-36 of UDO) without language outlining what <br /> the burden of proof of an <br /> applicant for a variance was. <br /> Staff has added this language, <br /> which includes references to an <br /> applicant's 'burden or <br /> persuasion'the proposal <br /> complies with the UDO. <br /> Page(s) 16 through 19 of agenda Section references have been Action on adopting amendments <br /> packet updated due to adding a new need to reflect the re-numbered <br /> Section 2.10.3 as outlined above section(s) <br /> (pages 2-37—2-41 of UDO) <br /> Page 20 of agenda packet New Section 2.11.3 entitled As indicated with the change to <br /> 'Burden of Proof Section 2.10.3, the County <br /> (page 2-42 of UDO) Attorney was concerned over <br /> legal sufficiency of UDO without <br /> language outlining what the <br /> burden of proof of an applicant <br /> for an interpretation was. <br /> Staff has added requested <br /> language. <br /> Pages 20 through 21 of agenda Section references have been Action on adopting amendments <br /> packet updated due to adding a new need to reflect the re-numbered <br /> Section 2.11.3 as outlined above section(s) <br /> (pages 2-4—2-43 of U DO) <br /> Page 27 of agenda packet Identification of change to The current draft shows the <br /> Section 5.1.1 Prohibited Uses. following language 'but not <br /> (page 5-1 of UDO) deleted'as existing text. It is <br /> not. The revision is necessary to <br /> ensure we are capturing the <br /> proposed amendment property. <br />