Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-23-2005-w2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005-w2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:25:02 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:27:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
w2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050523
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />levels of nutrients -primarily phosphorus and nitrogen -and high levels of chlorophyll a, <br />which is an indicator of algal growth. NCDWQ considers Jordan Lake to be one of the <br />most biologically productive (or eutrophic) lakes in the State, <br />As a result of these findings, NCDWQ determined that the Upper New Hope Arm of <br />Jordan Lake (which includes the towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the "Joint <br />Planning Area") must address the elevated chlorophyll-a levels resulting from excessive <br />nutrient loads (nitrogen and phosphorus) to the lake, using a Total Maximum Daily Load <br />(TMDL) standard. Point sources account for 45% of the Total Nitrogen (TN) and 18% of <br />the Total Phosphorus (TP) load to the Upper New Hope Arm of the lake,. Overall, it is <br />estimated that non-point sources contribute about 70% of the total nutrient load to the <br />lake. Three major publicly-owned wastewater treatment plants and several small <br />privately owned "package" plants discharge highly treated effluent just a short distance <br />from the lake. <br />In 2004-05, a Jordan Lake Stakeholders Project (convened by NCDWQ, Triangle ,1 <br />Council of Governments and Piedmont Triad Council of Governments), worked to <br />evaluate the model results and provide a framework to address these issues. While <br />many fruitful discussions and review of the modeling results were held, no consensus on <br />strategy recommendations emerged from the process, As such, the NCDWQ decided to <br />move forward with a phased-in Nutrient Management Strategy (NMS) and Total <br />Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) rules in late 2004. <br />The proposed nutrient management measures address both point sources and non-paint <br />sources (from developed land surfaces in the upstream drainage area). If not managed <br />properly, population and economic growth projected to occur in the watershed over the <br />coming decades will threaten the ability of the lake to support its designated uses as a <br />major regional drinking water supply, recreational resource, and aquatic habitat, These <br />rules will have impacts on local stormwater programs, agricultural practices, <br />development standards, and wastewater treatment (similar to new rules put in place for <br />the Neuse River basin in 1999).. <br />There has been some disagreement among stakeholders about the NCDWQ proposal. <br />Some groups, including the Citizens for Clean Water and the Haw River Assembly, have <br />concerns that not enough has been done to address water quality issues since the 1983 <br />NSW classification, and are supportive of the NCDWQ proposal. Utility providers and <br />municipalities have expressed concerns about the validity of the model results, and the <br />inherent uricertainty due to limitations of sampling data, as well as the economic impacts <br />of the proposal an their wastewater treatment plants and stormwater control measures. <br />Proposed ]ordan Lake Non-Point Source Nutrient <br />Management Strategy /Orange County Implications <br />As previously Hated, strategies to reduce Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus <br />would be implemented throughout the entire watershed. Portions of Orange <br />County fall within two different sectors of the Jordan Lake watershed. Based on <br />the modeling of the watershed, the measures would differ significantly between <br />the two sectors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.