Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-23-2005-w2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005-w2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:25:02 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:27:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
w2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050523
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. Everett./ordan Resernoir Nutrient MmvaQemenr Sn-ate~v and Th1D/ -PuGlic /teoiea~ Draf <br />Li 2003, a stakeholder group was established to assist DWQ and the NC Environmental <br />Management Commission (EMC) in developing the Jordan Lake TMDL. and a nutrient management <br />strategy for the .Jordan Lake Watershed. The TMDL, target was drafted after a series of meetings. <br />The TMbL target for the Haw River Arm of the lake is 8 % total N reduction and 5 % total P <br />reduction, both relative to the baseline period of 1997,2001- The TMDL target fbr the Lipper <br />New Hope Arm of the lake is 35 % total N reduction and 5 % total P reduction, both relative to the <br />baseline period of 1997-2001 (Michelle Woolfolk, 2003)t The middle and lower portions of the <br />New Hope Arm are currently meeting their intended uses.. However, DWQ has proposed a cap on <br />existing loading to maintain current conditions in this heavily-used portion of the lake and to <br />prevent loading to this portion from affecting conditions in the impaired and stressed portions <br />(Upper New Hope and Haw River Arms). <br />Proposed Strategy for Public Comment <br />The stakeholders and DWQ staff developed and evaluated several possible scenarios of NPS <br />management strategies before DWQ prepared the recommended strategy for public comment in <br />Table 3, below. The five scenarios are provided in an Appendix for information purposes, They <br />covered the spectrum of possibilities from completely voluntary to full regulation of all significant <br />nutrient sources. <br />The resulting NPS management strategy proposed here builds from concepts implemented in the <br />Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins.. It is recognized that this strategy will be controversial in <br />some quarters, and that public input will be needed before the Division staff can recommend a final <br />strategy to the Water' Quality Committee and the Environmental Management Commission for <br />potential rule-making. <br />For the subject areas of agriculture, urban stormwater, nutrient management, and riparian buffer <br />protection, the Division would propose to work in general from the rules adopted in the 7ar- <br />Pamlico River Basin. The text of each of the Tar-Pamlico rules can be found at <br />httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/nps/tarpam.htm. <br />Control of point and nonpoint sources of nutrients may require a higher reduction percentage if reductions from <br />background sources are not sought and therefore must be achieved elsewhere. If the necessary reduction is achieved by <br />the point and nonpoint sources in proportion to their contribution to existing load, the targets for implementation would <br />increase to 9% 7N and 6% 7P reduction in the Haw River Arm, and 42% TN and 7% 7P reduction in the Upper New <br />]lope Arm <br />D 14'O AOodelirzg ~ TdIDL Unil, h'4 page 9-17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.