Browse
Search
BOA minutes 050718
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
BOA minutes 050718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2019 4:40:24 PM
Creation date
4/15/2019 4:39:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/7/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED JULY 9, 2018 <br /> 341 property owner, once the property owner has brought forward a tax exemption certificate from the <br /> 342 Department of Revenue, the statute seems to require the county must accept that and cannot look behind <br /> 343 it. Aside from the issue of identity of the entities, what authority does LeAnn Brown think the Board of <br /> 344 Adjustment has to look behind the certificate issued by the Department of Revenue? <br /> 345 <br /> 346 LeAnn Brown answered she thinks that is interesting and will be a question of first impression because the <br /> 347 statute is new. Whether a county has the authority to look behind the certificate has not been litigated. She <br /> 348 has never seen a tax exemption certificate issued to the owner of this property as Southeast Property <br /> 349 Group LLC or Wild Flora Farm LLC, so she has not asked that question yet because she is not past the <br /> 350 identity question. She thinks the county staff should have looked at the document and said the property <br /> 351 owner is Southeast Property Group LLC and the certificate is issued to Wild Flora Farm. Done. She thinks <br /> 352 that would have been correct. She asserts that the county looked behind the certificate and made an <br /> 353 argument that the legal formalities of corporate ownership and individual ownership somehow have no <br /> 354 meaning and issued an opinion which blended together a bunch of legal entities. She added that one <br /> 355 reason she wanted to bifurcate the hearing was because it is difficult for her to answer questions until she <br /> 356 can see what she is talking about. She is 100 percent certain that the Board of Adjustment does not hold a <br /> 357 tax certificate with the name of the property owner on it, even if we assume that a post-issuance merger <br /> 358 somehow has play here. <br /> 359 <br /> 360 Andy Petesch said that was quite a bit of time that LeAnn Brown had and asked for 66 seconds. <br /> 361 <br /> 362 Karen Barrows granted that time. <br /> 363 <br /> 364 Andy Petesch said the question is what would this board would do with this information if they got it. If this <br /> 365 board starts going behind the Department of Revenue, there will be attorney fees awarded to Kara Brewer <br /> 366 and SPG and Wild Flora Farm because that is absolutely outside the scope of this board's authority. If this <br /> 367 board wants very specific additional documentation with respect to whether Wild Flora Farm LLC is what <br /> 368 the Department of Revenue intended when it issued the certificate, that can be addressed. The rest is <br /> 369 entirely unnecessary to determine that entity question. <br /> 370 <br /> 371 Karen Barrows asked whether there were any other questions. <br /> 372 <br /> 373 Barry Katz asked whether he understood correctly that regardless of the Board of Adjustment's decision, it <br /> 374 was going to be appealed to Superior Court. <br /> 375 <br /> 376 Andy Petesch, standing with LeAnn Brown, said they could jointly respond. Andy Petesch said it was <br /> 377 uncharted waters and they are unsure how a court will treat an appeal of this decision. LeAnn Brown said it <br /> 378 is fair to say whatever the board does with this case, it will end up as an appeal somewhere. She believes <br /> 379 there are three or four appeals on this case already. She will have to appeal because without the <br /> 380 subpoenaed documents, her hands are tied to make burden of proof to this board. <br /> 381 <br /> 382 Barry Katz said that was his understanding. He anticipated this. He then asked Andy Petesch whether the <br /> 383 fees he alluded to would be directed at LeAnn Brown's clients. <br /> 384 <br /> 385 Andy Petesch said the county would be liable for attorney's fees, under state statutes, <br /> 386 <br /> 387 LeAnn Brown said it is troublesome to her that the board would consider the threat of attorney's fees when <br /> 388 making a decision on this matter. Having read the statute several times, she does not think it is a foregone <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.