Browse
Search
BOA minutes 050718
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
BOA minutes 050718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2019 4:40:24 PM
Creation date
4/15/2019 4:39:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/7/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED JULY 9, 2018 <br /> 49 offending person to leave the meeting until that individual regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be <br /> 50 restored, the Chair will recess the meeting until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is <br /> 51 observed. All electronic devices such as cell phones, pagers, and computers should please be turned off or <br /> 52 set to silent/vibrate. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 The Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial administrative body established in accordance with the provisions <br /> 55 of local regulations and State law to perform specified functions essential to the County's planning program. <br /> 56 Action(s) taken by the board are based solely on competent, substantial, and material evidence presented <br /> 57 during a previously scheduled and advertised public hearing on a specific item. As detailed within Section <br /> 58 2.12.2 of the UFO the Board chair reserves the right to exclude evidence and testimony that is deemed: <br /> 59 incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious'and therefore fails to reasonably address the issues <br /> 60 before the Board of Adjustment. While it should be noted there is no time limit on the presentation of <br /> 61 evidence, the Chair asks that the presentation of evidence be consistent with established policies, rules of <br /> 62 procedure, and acceptable levels of decorum to ensure a fair and equitable hearing for all parties. <br /> 63 <br /> 64 <br /> 65 AGENDA ITEM 5; CASE A-3-18 — Public Hearing to begin reviewing an <br /> 66 application appealing the final determination of the Planning Director, as <br /> 67 articulated in an October 13, 2017, letter, concerning a parcel of property <br /> 68 located at the intersection of Morrow Mill and Millikan Roads (PIN: 9729-50- <br /> 69 7168) owned/operated by Southeast Property Group LLC (a.k.a. Wild Flora <br /> 70 Farm) care of Ms. Kara Brewer. <br /> 71 <br /> 72 Review of this item at the May 7, 2018, meeting shall be limited to the Board <br /> 73 reviewinglacting on a request from the applicant to issue subpoenas <br /> 74 compelling the submittal of information deemed essential to the proceeding. <br /> 75 <br /> 76 Karen Barrows asked whether there was anyone who wished to speak who needed to be sworn in. <br /> 77 <br /> 78 Michael Harvey said two attorneys would be presenting arguments this evening concerning the issuance of <br /> 79 subpoenas. `there would be no need to swear in witnesses unless either attorney wished to call one for <br /> 80 testimony. <br /> 81 <br /> 82 Michael Harvey said this is a convening of a hearing to begin reviewing an appeal application concerning <br /> 83 the October 13, 2017, determination made by the Planning Director. He noted that in the abstract the <br /> 84 attorneys for the applicants as well as the impacted property owners have filed a joint request that is <br /> 85 contained in Attachment 2 beginning on Page 62 of the agenda packet that the board first address the <br /> 86 denial of the subpoena request by the vice chair. That is the sole discussion point for this evening. Both <br /> 87 attorneys have requested that after the Board of Adjustment has made a decision on the subpoenas that <br /> 88 action on the appeal itself be delayed until a future meeting. <br /> 89 <br /> 90 Barry Katz asked for clarification that the Board of Adjustment will hear this again. Michael Harvey said yes, <br /> 91 the Board of Adjustment will hear the merits of the appeal at a future meeting. <br /> 92 <br /> 93 Karen Barrows stated that the reason she had decided not to sign the subpoenas was that Barry Katz and <br /> 94 Susan Halkiotis have heard quite a bit of testimony about this issue. She knew if she refused, it would <br /> 95 come before this board and her fellow board members would be able to give input as well. <br /> 96 <br /> 97 Michael Harvey summarized the abstract;Attachment 1, pages 3-65, is the appeal application and <br /> 98 subpoenas request. Attachment 2, beginning on Page 66, is the joint correspondence concerning review of <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.