Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved July 9, 2018 <br />7 <br />can¶t answer any questions. The attorney¶s office can provide you direction as it relates to <br />interpretation of the law and implementation of the ordinance. And while Patrick Mallett has <br />already covered this, I am going to make the explicit statement for the record that staff has <br />received no documentation, evidence, or any testimony from anybody indicating that the applicant <br />has not met their burden as defined in the ordinance with respect to specific criteria for <br />establishing a daycare or the general findings of fact in Section 5.3.2A. <br />Matt Hughes:I do have one question. This is my first and last case where this occurred, but is the <br />applicant also required to adhere to the conditions imposed by the Special Use Permit in July <br />2015? <br />Michael Harvey and Patrick Mallett: Yes. <br />Matt Hughes: So we don¶t need to touch on existing vegetation being maintained or anything else. <br />Those conditions are still applicable. <br />Michael Harvey: Those conditions are still applicable. All you are approving, as Mr. Mallett has <br />pointed out and the abstract has pointed out, is a modification to allow that expansion to happen. <br />All those original conditions are still applicable. <br />Samantha Cabe: Does anyone have any questions for the applicant or staff? Do I have a motion <br />to close the public hearing and begin deliberation? <br />MOTION made by Matt Hughes to close the public hearing. Susan Halkiotis seconded. <br />VOTEE: Unanimous <br />Samantha Cabe:At this time, we will begin going through the abstract and the required findings, <br />one section at a time. With regard to the application component, do I have a motion that we adopt <br />staff¶s recommendations on that section on Page 81 (it¶s the green section)?