Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-19-2002 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 02-19-2002
>
Agenda - 02-19-2002 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 11:33:26 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:27:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020219
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> LCID recycling facility could be operated at a profit for the Landfill Fund and offer producers <br /> of landclearing debris a reasonably priced, local alternative to burning and landfilling. <br /> • Having the materials ground on-site and hauled away by private contractors to a permitted <br /> landfill(or recycling facility) would cost an estimated$9,000411,000 per acre (assuming no <br /> tipping fee is charged at the destination and the acreage is only moderately dense). On-site <br /> grinding and hauling to an LCID landfill/recycling facility with a $5-$6 1ton tipping fee would <br /> cost an estimated$11,000413,000. Grinding materials on site and leaving the mulch in place <br /> would cost an estimated$6,500-$8,000 per acre. <br /> • It has been estimated that for a private contractor to load and haul landclearing debris to an <br /> LCID landfill/recycling facility, including$5-$6 1ton tipping fee, could cost$7,000-$9,000 1acre. <br /> • Does not preclude some governmental financial assistance/subsidy, however, if the Solid Waste <br /> Enterprise Fund is to provide the subsidy, it is likely that the subsidy must be available to the <br /> community at—large (developers). Staff, based on previous County Attorney statements, believes <br /> the fund cannot differentiate. <br /> • If a subsidy is to be offered only to agriculture community, a clear definition or method of <br /> identifying legitimate farming operations must be developed and applied, and a non-Solid Waste <br /> Management Fund source of funding must be identified. Staff believes this could be done by <br /> establishment of appropriate criteria. <br /> 3. County could mobilize Solid Waste Management Department staff/equipment to farms and <br /> grind the landclearing materials on-site. <br /> Description: <br /> This option assumes that the Solid Waste Management Department will utilize equipment already <br /> planned to be acquired as part of C&D recycling activities related to the adoption of the RRMO, <br /> plus additional equipment and staffing necessary to provide mobile, on-site grinding operations. <br /> Key Issues: <br /> • Consistent with BOCC interest in actively promoting and supporting the agriculture community <br /> in Orange County. <br /> • Notwithstanding some of the issues noted below, the Solid Waste Management Department <br /> could provide this on-site service to the agriculture community and, if necessary, the <br /> development community. <br /> • Large wood waste grinder(weighing approx. 125,000 lbs., including tractor and trailer) <br /> exceeds many rural state bridge%ulvert weight limits. <br /> • Many farms would have entrances or culverts unable to support size and weight of equipment. <br /> • Performing this service on private property may involve liability issues. <br /> • Equipment could not be mobilized in damp weather due to possibility of getting stuck or <br /> damaging farmland. Equipment already mobilized could be stranded until ground dries. <br /> • Due to limited storage space at the landfill for vegetative waste and clean wood waste waiting <br /> to be ground, the grinder would only be able to be away from the landfill mulching operation <br /> for brief periods of time (est.8-10 days max.). <br /> • Could inadvertently encourage landclearing if made too accommodating or inexpensive. <br /> • If Solid Waste Management Fund is to fund on-site operations for agriculture related <br /> landclearing, the Fund may be legally obligated to provide this service for the non-agriculture <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.