Orange County NC Website
33 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee said there is no limitation on the types of transit options the <br /> 2 County can pursue. He said there are any number of combinations, and also sees the need for <br /> 3 services to the rural/underserved areas of the County. He said he is excited to see what can be <br /> 4 accomplished. <br /> 5 Travis Myren said the only limits are imagination and resources. <br /> 6 Commissioner Marcoplos said the transportation challenge has not gone away. He said <br /> 7 there are future unmet needs, and this transit tax money will be utilized for the good. <br /> 8 Chair Rich referred to Pittsboro in Chatham County, where the bus service is a non- <br /> 9 profit and the Orange Chatham Work group has been talking about this going public. <br /> 10 Chair Rich said she talked with John Roberts about the original partners of the transit <br /> 11 plan, and said all were at the discussion table, which will continue. <br /> 12 Chair Rich said the meeting yesterday with the partners was yesterday afternoon, with <br /> 13 some present and some called in; and they talked about having the public involved in every <br /> 14 step going forward. <br /> 15 Commissioner Marcoplos ran down the 5 major hurdles that nixed the light rail project: <br /> 16 <br /> 17 • Duke University— in 2017 Trask sent a letter of support, but at the last <br /> 18 minute they sent a letter that said they never supported the plan. This made <br /> 19 Duke a disingenuous partner. <br /> 20 • NC Railroad —they made them jump through hoops (money to be paid to <br /> 21 them to be in the ROWs) <br /> 22 • State legislature- did everything they could to knee cap the project- <br /> 23 Rising costs due to voluntary effort - unexpected FTA contingency <br /> 24 requirements <br /> 25 Federal shutdown <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Commissioner Marcoplos said the Board has a lot to think about to fill the void that this <br /> 28 project leaves: economic development (developers prefer light rail over BRT); jobs; issues of <br /> 29 environment and health; housing and social equity around station areas; less parking, etc. <br /> 30 Commissioner Marcoplos said the most effective rapid transit that can be relied upon to <br /> 31 provide fixed duration trips must be located outside the general road traffic. He questioned <br /> 32 whether BRT solutions can be designed that minimizes BRT creep. He said the UNC hospital <br /> 33 area is busiest transit node on the route, with Duke Hospital being similar. He said fitting in new <br /> 34 modes of transit into these already very busy areas will be a challenge. He said connecting the <br /> 35 three universities was a key accomplishment of the LRT route design, and the Board must <br /> 36 remain committed to a regional transit plan while continuing to strengthen the local in-County <br /> 37 systems. He said the ongoing collaboration between Orange County partners must continue. <br /> 38 Commissioner Greene said, from her perspective, the following has been lost: <br /> 39 • DOLRT was part of a larger vision for the region to shape development and expand <br /> 40 mobility <br /> 41 0 Connection of the three universities and various hospital systems <br /> 42 • Downtown Durham —employment destination for Orange County residents and vice <br /> 43 versa <br /> 44 • Expansion of realistic job opportunities <br /> 45 • Affordable housing strategies around rail stations <br /> 46 • Economic benefits for all of Orange County <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Commissioner Greene said she is sorry for the classes that students will not be able to <br /> 49 take due to the lack of light rail. <br />