Orange County NC Website
7 <br /> Attachment 2 <br /> SUMMARY OF TABLE OF PERMITTED USES TEXT CHANGES: <br /> SECTION BEING WHAT HAS CHANGED WHY <br /> MODIFIED <br /> 2.10 Variances 1. Section 2.10.2 (B) (4) (Application County Attorney was concerned over the legal <br /> Requirements) — updating references to sufficiency of LIDO without language outlining <br /> renumbered UDO section (changing what the burden of proof of an applicant for a <br /> reference from Section 2.10.3 to Section variance was. <br /> 2.10.4); <br /> 2. Adding a new Section 2.10.3 entitled 'Burden Staff has added this language, which includes <br /> of Proof' including language establishing an references to an applicant's `burden of <br /> applicant's burden of persuasion; persuasion' with respect to demonstrating a <br /> variance request complies with the various <br /> 3. Existing Section numbers being re-numbered parameters of LIDO, allowing same to be <br /> to accommodate a new Section 2.10.3; issued. <br /> 4. Renumbered Section 2.10.5 (Additional This language was added at the <br /> Criteria for Authorized Variances — Special recommendation of the County Attorney. <br /> Flood Hazard Areas) - updating references to <br /> renumbered UDO section (changing This addition causes a re-numbering of <br /> reference from Section 2.10.3 to Section existing section(s) and required updating of <br /> 2.10.4); various section references. <br /> 5. Renumbered Section 2.10.6 (E) (1) <br /> (Additional Criteria for Authorized Variances <br /> — Watershed Protection Overlay District) - <br /> updating references to renumbered UDO <br /> section (changing reference from Section <br /> 2.10.5 to Section 2.10.6); <br /> 6. Renumbered Section 2.10.10 (A) (Findings of <br /> Fact) - updating references to renumbered <br /> LIDO section (changing reference from <br /> Section 2.10.3 to Section 2.10.4). <br /> 2.11 Interpretations 1. Adding a new Section 2.11.3 entitled 'Burden County Attorney was concerned over the legal <br /> of Proof' including language establishing an sufficiency of LIDO without language outlining <br /> applicant's burden of persuasion; what the burden of proof of an applicant for an <br /> 2. Existing Section numbers being re-numbered interpretation was. <br /> to accommodate a new Section 2.11.3. Staff has added this language, which includes <br /> references to an applicant's `burden of <br /> persuasion' with respect to demonstrating an <br /> interpretation request complies with the <br /> various parameters of UDO, allowing same to <br /> be issued (i.e. overturn a staff decision). <br /> This language was added at the <br /> recommendation of the County Attorney. <br /> This addition causes a re-numbering of <br /> existing section(s) and required updating of <br /> various section references. <br />