Browse
Search
Agenda - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Table of Permitted Uses
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
Agenda - 04-16-19
>
Agenda - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Table of Permitted Uses
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2019 1:27:14 PM
Creation date
4/12/2019 1:09:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/16/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-16-2019 Regular Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2019\Agenda - 04-16-19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 <br /> o Be permitted by right within the EDB-2 general use zoning district <br /> rather than through the Conditional Use permitting process as <br /> currently required; <br /> o Be permitted by right within the EDH-4 and EDH-5 general use <br /> zoning districts consistent with direction received from the BOCC in <br /> 2016. Currently the use is not permitted within either of the <br /> districts. <br /> The existing Tourist Home land use category is being eliminated as part of this <br /> process. <br /> The existing Rooming House land use category shall continue to be permitted <br /> under the `Residential Land Use' category in the same general use zoning <br /> districts as detailed herein. <br /> 15.Is the rental of a house for single-family residential purposes impacted by <br /> the proposed amendments? <br /> The rental of a house for use as a single-family residence is not impacted by <br /> these proposed amendments. <br /> 16.What about rental of a house for use as an Airbnb? <br /> There are concerns over what authority Orange County has to regulate this <br /> activity, which can be summarized as follows: <br /> • Regulations controlling the duration of a private lease, or the nature of <br /> occupancy of a private residence, go beyond regulating a property's use. <br /> Such regulations could be construed as restraining the manner in which <br /> the property is owned, which is prohibited by North Carolina case law. <br /> • It is unlawful to regulate residential rental property by implementing <br /> permitting programs or by requiring homeowners to pay a special fee. <br /> • There is a State law, specifically the North Carolina Vacation Rental Act, <br /> appearing to preempt local regulation of vacation rental agreements in <br /> residential properties. The Act defines "vacation rental" as being the "[t]he <br /> rental of residential property for vacation, leisure, or recreation purposes <br /> for fewer than 90 days . . .." <br /> From a regulatory standpoint, the proposed Ordinance amendment package <br /> impacts rental of a residence as an Airbnb as follows: <br /> a. Short Term Rental — Non-host Occupied is defined as follows: A dwelling <br /> which provides guestrooms for overnight rental or lease but is not <br /> occupied by a host; <br /> b. The land use is not permitted for development within residential zoning <br /> districts; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.