Browse
Search
Agenda - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Table of Permitted Uses
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
Agenda - 04-16-19
>
Agenda - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Table of Permitted Uses
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2019 1:27:14 PM
Creation date
4/12/2019 1:09:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/16/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-16-2019 Regular Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2019\Agenda - 04-16-19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
45 <br /> A single-family residence, for example, is still permitted by right in the various <br /> general use residential zoning districts, subject to staff review and approval. A <br /> use requiring a special use permit, such as a retreat center or a <br /> telecommunication tower, is still required to go through that process. <br /> Proposed amendments do not alter required review timeframes either. <br /> Uses permitted by right will still take approximately 7 to 30 days to review, <br /> depending on the proposed activity (i.e. single-family residence versus a non- <br /> residential land use). <br /> Uses permitted through the special use permitting process will continue to take <br /> approximately 2 '/2 to 4 months to review depending on which process is required <br /> (i.e. Class B versus Class A). <br /> 10.Does this proposal alter allowable land uses within various districts? <br /> Yes. In many non-residential zoning districts, additional land uses are going to <br /> be permitted consistent with the previously defined nature and intent of the <br /> district. <br /> For example, staff has expanded allowable land uses within the Economic <br /> Development Hillsborough Office/Retail (EDH-4) and the Economic Development <br /> Hillsborough Research and Manufacturing (EDH-5) general use zoning districts <br /> consistent with direction from the BOCC received in the fall of 2016. <br /> These districts have the following purpose/intent: <br /> • EDH-4: provide locations for high intensity office uses and supporting <br /> retail and service uses in the designated Hillsborough Economic <br /> Development District. <br /> • EDH-5: provide locations for a wide range of research, assembling, <br /> fabricating and light manufacturing activities, and such ancillary industrial <br /> activities as warehousing and distribution in the designated Hillsborough <br /> Economic Development District. <br /> Additional land uses were added consistent with defined `purpose' of each <br /> district. <br /> 11.Does this amendment establish regulations on farm operations? <br /> No. Proposed amendments do not establish new regulations inconsistent with <br /> applicable State law relating to agricultural/farming operations. <br /> 12.1 am concerned about the location of an asphalt plant in Orange County. <br /> How will they be treated if the new table is adopted? <br /> Under current regulations, an asphalt plant could be located within the Heavy <br /> Industrial (I-3) general use zoning district. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.