Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-23-2005-d1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005-d1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:25:43 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:27:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
d1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050523
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
project. Traditionally, loans ran be difficult to come by and farmers are unlikely to <br />pursue high-risk ventures. If is unlikely that a farmer will pursue a new operation that <br />requires significant up-front costs, without prior market research. It is more likely That a <br />farmer will begin a new operation on a small scale and slowly expand the operation if if <br />appears to be successful, <br />Many new buildings, constructed for farm-related uses can be modified for another use, <br />if needed. Farmers who request fo have their property rezoned fo allow for a rural <br />enterprise, can always apply for another use if they wish to expand or change their <br />operation. Some of these types of questions can be explored and `Meshed out" more <br />fully once amendments are drafted, Whaf would happen fo a successful accessory use <br />if the bona fide farm went out of business? Perhaps that portion of the farm could be <br />subdivided from the larger tract and rezoned to the specific agricultural use following fhe <br />conditional district process, There are different approaches to handling farm uses; the <br />County ma,y wish to approve amendments to begin the rural enterprises initiative, <br />monitor fhe success of the project for a few years and then consider revisions, rather <br />than eliminating options up front. <br />8. Can the rural enterprises project dovetail with the proposed Transfer of <br />Development (TDR) proposal? <br />The rural enterprises project and the transfer of development proposal are both tools <br />designed fo preserve farming in Orange County, albeit in somewhat different ways. A <br />TDR program is designed to reduce development pressure around a particular area b,y <br />sending development to a target area, which can better accommodate it, It uses <br />development monies to preserve farmland, Depending on the arrangement, the farmer <br />receives trnancial compensation for transferring (selling) his or her development rights, <br />The rural enterprises project, by contrast, is a program designed to keep farming an <br />economically viable business b,y permitting farmers fo explore more innovative farm <br />operations, Staffs proposal fo allow farmers more value-added options planes no long- <br />term obligations on their land. <br />A TDR program is an agricultural land preservation program; the rural enterprises <br />proposal is an agricultural economic development program. While it ma,y be possible to <br />incorporate a TDR program to encourage a farm processing plant in a rural part of the <br />county, for the most part TDRs are designed to keep development activity away from <br />agricultural lands. The two tools work in parallel tracks: a farmer can sell is or her <br />development rights fo a developer through a transfer of development program and then <br />pursue a rural enterprise. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.