Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-23-2005-d1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005
>
Agenda - 05-23-2005-d1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:25:43 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:27:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
d1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050523
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />Rural Enterprises Questions ~ Responses <br />(from the February 28, 2005 Joint BOCC/Planning Board Work Session) <br />Staff has been working on this project for a long time. Is there some way to <br />approve part of the proposal in the short term while continuing to revise some of <br />the other parts? <br />Staff's work on this initiative has focused on three main components: 1) clarifying what a <br />bona fide farm is and what uses are considered "related and incidental fo" a bona fide <br />farm; 2) categorizing different farm related uses for permitting purposes; and 3) <br />developing some sort mechanism to allow farm businesses that are commercial or <br />industrial in character, such as farm machine shops or small processing operations, to <br />occur in the rural parts of the county that are zoned residential. Staff is recommending <br />the introduction of conditional district zoning as a new mechanism for rezoning rural <br />lands for rural enterprises. <br />It would be possible to approve the project in iwo phases: the overall concept and <br />permitting categories as Phase 1 and the mechanism as Phase 2. Prior fo the approval <br />of Phase 2, agricultural uses of a commercial or light industrial character would only be <br />allowed in the rural activity nodes or in the Agricultural Residential Zoning District, <br />subject to a general rezoning to Agricultural Services. This two-phase option would offer <br />an opportunity to put part of the project info motion while continuing to study conditional <br />district zoning or another similar zoning tool, so long as the second phase was adopted <br />in a timely manner. If the first phase of the project, the clarification and categorization, <br />was adopted without the second phase the initiative would likely fall short of the long- <br />term goals set b,y staff--to provide real opportunities for the Local farming community. <br />2. What is the anticipated permit timeframe for rural enterprises based on this <br />project? How does it compare to the current timeframe from other types of <br />development projects? Will the proposal streamline the permitting process <br />enough to make a difference? <br />The ke,y concept behind this initiative is fo categorize permitting requirements for rural <br />enterprises based on their direct link to agriculture, their intensity, and their potential <br />impact on surrounding properties. The arrows at the bottom of the color progression <br />chart show the approximate processing timeframe for rural enterprises compared with <br />typical development permits. Staff has fried fo set up a permitting system for rural <br />enterprises within the framework of the County's existing development codes. <br />Bona fide farms and their accessory uses will continue to be exempt from County <br />zoning, in accordance to the State General Statutes. <br />The modified site plan, a zoning compliance permit, already exists in the Orange <br />County Zoning Ordinance. Property owners can draw their own site plan so long <br />as it shows the important information-the location of off-road parking, for <br />example--are shown. Planning staff approve modified site plans; the review time <br />should be minimal, particularly if the applicant works with planning and farm <br />agency staff upfront. <br />A standard site plan needs to be professionally prepared, but again, review time <br />should be minimal if the applicant works with planning and farm agency staff to <br />determine what information needs fo be shown on the plan and what, if any, <br />other types of permits (such as state or federal permits linked to agricultural <br />uses) are required. <br />.n.i .. .: !-h~ i i ,if~l I .,. a .'llf~i~ii:: ~ ..~i -.. 6-„rl d.:: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.