Orange County NC Website
20 <br /> attract industry will disappear. He said he fears that sitting back and doing nothing will result in a <br /> lack of options. He said that residential development does not always break even. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin refocused the conversation on economic development as a <br /> county wide goal. He echoed Commissioner McKee's call for action and also called for <br /> engaging colleagues in other jurisdictions. He referred to a recent request from Carrboro <br /> concerning more Article 46 funding and other areas for potential collaboration in other <br /> jurisdictions. He said the lack of return on investment in the current Economic Development <br /> Districts makes the "one Orange" idea a tougher sell when the investments do not yield results. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he is eager to see plans from the other jurisdictions on <br /> economic development, and that he is more than willing to consider other ways to invest <br /> resources. <br /> Chair Rich said the conversation about economic development has been happening a <br /> long time. She said the lack of a long-term strategy and a lack of consistent success in her 6 <br /> years on the board are both disappointing. <br /> Commissioner Price said she supports considering changes to the Buckhorn district in <br /> light of the SWOT analysis, as well as further conversations with jurisdictions about investment <br /> inside the towns. <br /> Commissioner Price said the lack of economic development impact has led to many <br /> young people leaving the County because of better opportunities elsewhere. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos checked with the group about their support for making <br /> changes in zoning for the Buckhorn economic development district. The group agreed that they <br /> would at least like to see a plan. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos suggested that the Board should explore whether or not there <br /> is a way to explore development of land along Highway 10 inside the rural buffer while honoring <br /> the intent of the rural buffer. He suggested looking at rezoning there. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos also supported the idea of expanding the water and sewer <br /> agreements with OWASA. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin redirected the conversation to collaboration with other <br /> jurisdictions. <br /> Commissioner McKee said funds not working well in a district could be used in other <br /> jurisdictions. He reminded the group that sewer and water have only been available in the <br /> districts for 7 years. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said investments have been made and that residential growth <br /> could be at risk. <br /> Commissioner McKee reminded the group that the Gravelly Hill sewer and water access <br /> wasn't put in for residential areas. <br /> Steve Brantley said the perception that the Buckhorn district is a failure does not take <br /> into account the competition 4 miles away in Alamance County. <br /> Chair Rich said she never called it a failure, but does not see it progressing. <br /> Steve Brantley said the SWOT analysis shows that Alamance is a significant competitor. <br /> He said one of the most attractive pieces of land the county has contains no roads and utilities, <br /> and a lack of utilities has hindered immediate progress. He said he has seen a lot of interest in <br /> the districts and mentioned the success of attracting an industry when utilities were in place. <br /> Steve Brantley then identified a piece of property off the interstate that has the best <br /> appeal for investment. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked why the county cannot meet with the owner and market <br /> the property. <br /> Steve Brantley said the property is outside the sewer/water agreement and has zoning <br /> issues. He added that he is limited in what he can sell by what he can show, and the topography <br /> is not ideal and houses are now in the areas. <br />