Orange County NC Website
z <br />the six counties in their endeavor, Ron Holdway and Rosemary Summers participated on two <br />different site visitor accrediting teams -- Mr. Holdway for Buncombe County and Dr. Summers <br />for New Hanover County, Generally, all six counties engaged in the pilot process report that the <br />initial process was valuable in establishing a quality assurance function within each department <br />that examined all programs and processes against the standards in the accreditation tool, The <br />NC Association of Local Health Directors and the NC Department of Health and Human <br />Services prepared a videotape summary of the experiences of the six pilot counties. This <br />videotape is available for review from the County's Health Department. As a result of the pilot, <br />the accreditation criteria and process have been revised and will be "re-piloted" with four <br />additional counties in the winter of 2004-2005, <br />The Orange County Board of Health believes that accreditation of local health departments is <br />an important step in recognizing the competence of public health departments and passed a <br />resoluticn favoring mandatory accreditation with ongoing State funding to each health <br />department beginning in the year of initial accreditation to support the accreditation process and <br />to ensure that quality assurance efforts continue beyond the accreditation year, This is the <br />recommendation contained in the final report of the Public Health Task Force. <br />The North Carolina Association of County Commissioners has expressed some concerns <br />regarding the mandatory accreditation provision of the Task Force Recommendations. The <br />attached resolution calls for the Orange County Board of Commissioners to support voluntary <br />accreditation and joins the Board of Health in recommending State appropriation of $50,000 per <br />year of ongoing funding to each local health department. Same counties' commissioners have <br />expressed concern that accreditation will cost too much in terms of potential upgrades needed <br />to meet accreditation standards, While some local health departments may need additional <br />resources in order to meet standards, the NCALHD believes that the majority will be able to <br />meet the proposed standards, <br />Examples of the benefits of accreditation include: <br />• Utilizes a publicly and professionally accepted mechanism for demonstrating the <br />competence of organizations ("seal of approval"); <br />• Establishes a basic minimum level of uniformity in local ptablic health services; <br />• Provides a framework for quality assurance and quality improvement; <br />• Provides data for benchmarking and best practices; <br />• Serves as a tool for local decision-making, evaluation and monitoring; <br />• Serves as an index for allocating local resources; <br />• Demonstrates accountability to stakeholders; <br />• Enhances agency credibility among public and private partners; <br />Enhances agency image and improves community and consumer confidence; and <br />• Provides competitive advantage for procuring funding, <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. The resolution calls for the allocation of resources by <br />the State to engage in the accreditation process, The long-term financial implications of Orange <br />County participation in the process or the assessment of outcomes as a result of the process <br />cannot be determined with any reliability at this time. Any financial implications would have to <br />be evaluated and addressed as part of normal budget deliberations by the Board of <br />Commissioners. <br />