Orange County NC Website
7 <br /> 1 Myra Dotson said she is here to address OWASA's role in greenhouse gas emissions, <br /> 2 and she has lived in the Orange Grove community, where OWASA has dumped sewage sludge <br /> 3 in her neighborhood for a long time. She said Orange County is the 5t" most sludge county in <br /> 4 the state, out of 100 counties. She said dumping sludge on land contaminates water, soil, food, <br /> 5 plants, wildlife, etc. She said many of the toxins are bio accumulated, meaning the quantity of <br /> 6 toxins add up. She said sludge gives off gases and dust, which is carried by the wind near and <br /> 7 far, and this is where sewage sludge and climate change intersect. She said it is hypocritical to <br /> 8 have OWASA play a role in climate change when it is contributing so greatly to pollution. She <br /> 9 said OWASA also has 2 uncovered industrial storage tanks off of highway 54 that hold millions <br /> 10 of gallons, which are also releasing untold amount of dangerous gases. She said the first gas <br /> 11 that sludge emits is mercury gas, which she and her neighbors have been routinely exposed to <br /> 12 for the past 40 years, not to mention the workers handling the sludge. She said many other <br /> 13 dangerous gases are also given off, and she has much scientific data to show these dangers. <br /> 14 Commissioner Dorosin said referred to the Rogers Road area, and requested an update <br /> 15 once the mains are in the ground and the process of what happens from April, with the mains <br /> 16 getting in the ground, up to actual homes being connected. <br /> 17 Chair Rich asked if this was a request for information, or a petition. <br /> 18 Commissioner Dorosin said this could be an information item to begin with. <br /> 19 Chair Rich said all governmental partners should be included as well. <br /> 20 Commissioner Dorosin said there was an ad hoc committee at one time. <br /> 21 Bonnie Hammersley said she would provide that information to the Board. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 b. Resolution Supporting Local Control of School Calendars <br /> 24 The Board considered voting to approve a resolution expressing support for local <br /> 25 boards of education and the restoration of local control of school calendars. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 BACKGROUND: <br /> 28 Until 2003, local boards of education in North Carolina established calendars for their <br /> 29 respective school years. In 2004 the North Carolina General Assembly seized control of <br /> 30 setting school calendars and imposed a one-size-fits-all mandate on how school calendars <br /> 31 are to be set. It was stated at the time that the goal was to provide uniformity across the <br /> 32 state as well as enhance North Carolina's tourism business. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 The current one-size-fits-all school calendar start date is no earlier than the Monday closest <br /> 35 to August 26 and the end date is no later than the Friday closest to June 11. This means <br /> 36 high schools do not complete the first semester until mid to late January, and requires high <br /> 37 school students to take first semester exams after the winter break, which negatively <br /> 38 impacts test scores. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 The parameters of the calendar also makes it nearly impossible for high school students or <br /> 41 recent winter graduates to take courses at a nearby community college or university during <br /> 42 the second semester, with the second semester for high schools starting two to three <br /> 43 weeks later than community colleges and universities. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 The current calendar structure also results in longer summers, contributing to more <br /> 46 "summer learning loss" for students, which has a disproportionate impact on low-income <br /> 47 children, and negatively impact child nutrition, as low-income children who have access to <br /> 48 regular meals at school through the free and reduced priced meal program may not have <br /> 49 access to regular meals at home. <br /> 50 <br />