Browse
Search
Agenda 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
Agenda - 03-07-19
>
Agenda 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2019 3:26:21 PM
Creation date
2/28/2019 3:18:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/7/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-07-2019 Regular Board Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2019\Agenda - 03-07-19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
24 <br /> 1 Julie McClintock endorsed hiring Davenport so it can dig into this new financial <br /> 2 model, how the additional costs will be paid for, and if the central services and schools can <br /> 3 be protected. She said many in the community appreciated the resolution passed last fall <br /> 4 that limited the Board's spending on this project to $149.5 million, plus interest. She said <br /> 5 there is a petition asking the Board to stick to this resolution, which has 366 signatures thus <br /> 6 far. She said Davenport can evaluate the transit tax revenues, but she would also like to <br /> 7 note the following items in the risk category: ridership estimates seem ambitious, given <br /> 8 that this is one fixed route that does not include the airport, RTP or Raleigh; this may not <br /> 9 mitigate traffic as hoped; the loss of affordable housing; and gentrification. She said is also <br /> 10 especially concerned for Chapel Hill Transit. <br /> 11 Commissioner McKee said this mentions a $30,000 cap, and asked if this is straight <br /> 12 forward reprocessing as before, would it not be that much. <br /> 13 Travis Myren said it comes in the same general format, and the costs would be <br /> 14 lower. <br /> 15 Commissioner McKee asked is there a retainer fee if Orange County engages <br /> 16 Davenport, but ends up not using Davenport; simply for having Davenport on hold. <br /> 17 Travis Myren said a termination provision would need to be available for any <br /> 18 reason, and the County would pay Davenport for any work completed to date, and <br /> 19 Davenport would turn over any work completed to date. <br /> 20 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that they are still waiting to get final numbers from <br /> 21 GoTriangle, and there is nothing to review at this time. <br /> 22 Travis Myren said that is correct. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Commissioner McKee said there is nothing to review now, but his concern is that if <br /> 25 Davenport is not in place there may be a lag time once the numbers come out to having <br /> 26 them reviewed. He asked if this is correct. <br /> 27 Travis Myren said as soon as the financial model is received staff can engage <br /> 28 Davenport and allow the Manager to sign a contract and approve a budget amendment. <br /> 29 He said, in the absence of that, staff needs to wait for another Board cycle to do that, and <br /> 30 everyone is up against an April 301" deadline. He said it is a balancing act. <br /> 31 Commissioner McKee said there is a Board cycle of 2 weeks from the time a <br /> 32 decision is made. <br /> 33 Commissioner Marcoplos clarified that if the Board puts money down for a future <br /> 34 analysis, but does not need it, then the County can get all the money back. <br /> 35 Travis Myren said yes, they would terminate the contract with no penalty. <br /> 36 Chair Rich asked if it is known how long it would take to turn such a report around. <br /> 37 Travis Myren said maybe during a 2-week Board cycle, if the format is as it was in <br /> 38 the past. <br /> 39 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the process is that there will be some additional <br /> 40 information coming from FTA. <br /> 41 Travis Myren said yes. <br /> 42 Commissioner Dorosin asked if sometime between now and April 301" a revised <br /> 43 transit plan will come back to the Board. <br /> 44 Travis Myren said yes. <br /> 45 Commissioner Dorosin asked if it is known who will review the numbers when they <br /> 46 come back. <br /> 47 Travis Myren said Orange County, Durham County staff and GoTriangle will review <br /> 48 the numbers. <br /> 49 Chair Rich invited comments from the Board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.