Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
13 <br /> • A long-range transportation vision for the area illustrating roadway alignment and <br /> corridor <br /> • width necessary to serve future land uses and address traffic impact as development <br /> occurs. <br /> • A plan that assists the County in promoting economic development through its <br /> development review process by encouraging developers to dedicate right-of-way <br /> necessary for future roads. <br /> The E-B-M AMP is not: <br /> • A proposal for, nor does it seek authorization for, funding right-of-way acquisition. <br /> • However, an AMP would be a necessary prerequisite to guide the investment to improve <br /> access, where necessary. <br /> • A collection of future road design and construction projects, nor does it include a <br /> schedule. <br /> • A guarantee that future development will occur or that roads will be built. <br /> Summary and key highlights from the E-B-M AMP <br /> Chapter 1 - Introduction —federal, state, and local regulations authorizing such plans including <br /> the process used in updating this plan. <br /> • 2030 Orange County Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives. <br /> • Traffic trend details in addition to the 2017 Transportation Study results. <br /> Chapter 2 —Access Management Planning — Introduction of 2017 Transportation Study and <br /> recommendations for the planning area. This should be a focus area for review. <br /> • Includes Volkert, Inc., County staff and the recently adopted Mebane 2040 <br /> • Comprehensive Transportation Plan (June 2018). <br /> Chapter 3— Enforcement (aka Implementation) — lists the various resources, roles and <br /> responsibilities of state and local officials as well as property owners. <br /> • Includes process to amend the plan through developer initiated Traffic Impact Analysis <br /> Chapter 4—Appendix—2011 E-B-M AMP, 2017 Transportation Study and remarks collected <br /> throughout the planning process. <br /> • Contains survey results and specific comments provided by the public. <br /> A summary of key planning areas and responses to public comments are provided below. Also <br /> see Attachment 1, Public Questions & Comments. <br /> o West of West Ten Road and east of Mebane city limits. <br /> • Plan updated to avoid multiple stream crossings. <br /> • Intersection locations updated and requiring additional study. <br /> o Railroad crossings in Efland — Efland-Cedar Grove Road to Mt. Willing Road. <br /> • Plan not changed; carry forward from original adopted 2011 E-B-M AMP. <br /> • Key crossing identified by staff requiring additional study. <br /> • NCDOT requests Orange County conduct feasibility study through MPO. <br /> o Turner Street Extension through Center Street residential area. <br /> • Plan not changed; carry forward from original adopted 2011 E-B-M AMP. <br /> • Property zoned Local Commercial; UDO Section 3.4.10 requires property "have <br /> • direct access to a street classified either as an arterial or collector". <br /> • Provide access to land locked parcels west of residential neighborhood. <br />