Orange County NC Website
21 <br /> 10, 2002, which outlined the County and Towns' intentions for developing the Greene Tract. The <br /> December 10, 2002 BOCC abstract which includes the approved resolution can be found at the <br /> following link: <br /> http://server3.co.orange.nc.us:8088/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=8376&dbid=0 <br /> The purpose of this item is to receive and discuss the proposed Greene Tract Resolution and <br /> Conceptual Plan. In addition, a project schedule to determine density and affordable housing <br /> goals could be also considered. <br /> Staff will provide any other information at the meeting, and the governing boards can discuss <br /> issues related to this item as necessary. <br /> Attachment 7a— Greene Tract Resolution and Conceptual Plan <br /> Attachment 7b—June 19, 2018 Information Item <br /> Attachment 7c— Greene Tract Flow Chart <br /> Craig Benedict made the following PowerPoint presentation: <br /> Greene Tract Update <br /> Assembly of Governments Meeting <br /> January 29, 2019 <br /> Background <br /> ■ Project area <br /> ■ Approximately 164 total acres <br /> ■ 104 acres jointly owned by Orange County, Town of Chapel Hill, and <br /> Town of Carrboro <br /> ■ 60 acres owned by Orange County <br /> ■ Previous Planning Efforts <br /> ■ 2002 Orange County, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro Greene Tract Resolution <br /> ■ Rogers Road Task Force Report <br /> ■ Mapping Our Community's Future Report <br /> ■ Managers, Mayors and Chair's Objectives from May 17, 2017 <br /> ■ Ongoing joint staffs collaboration <br /> Greene Tract (Jurisdictional Context) (map) <br /> Greene Tract (Flow Chart) 9:12:27 PM <br /> Greene Tract Ownership Status/Possible Transfers Map <br /> Greene Tract Conceptual Plan (Proposed Future Land Use) (map) <br /> Greene Tract Resolution and Conceptual Plan (map) <br /> ■ Elements of the Resolution <br /> ■ Modify Headwaters Preserve and Joint Owned areas <br /> ■ Approve Conceptual Plan and land use definitions <br /> ■ Designate acreage and land uses (Less than 15% future deviation) <br /> ■ Does not include any reference to density or affordable housing <br /> thresholds <br /> ■ Allow staff to proceed with recombination <br />