Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-21-2002 - 5c; VAD - Bacon
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
VAD/EVAD Agreements
>
2002
>
Agenda - 05-21-2002 - 5c; VAD - Bacon
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 12:52:56 PM
Creation date
2/6/2019 2:54:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. Voluntary Agricultural District Application-Don Johnson <br /> Farm <br /> Stencil reviewed the application and supporting materials for the Johnson <br /> Voluntary Agriculture) District Application. Staff recommended that the 10-acre <br /> tract H MBL p5.12..15A)be excluded from the VAD since it is not contiguous with <br /> the larger acreage. It was noted that the other two contiguous parcels totaled <br /> 160 acres and met he criteria fora Voluntary Agricultural District. <br /> MOTION: Welters motioned approval of the Johnson VAD application and to <br /> be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for <br /> establishment of a VAD. <br /> Seconded by Ranells. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> C. Recommendation on Triangle GreenPrint <br /> Stencil reviewed the February 25th presentation on the Triangle GreenPrint <br /> Report. The APB supports Greenprint's effort to coordinate regional open space <br /> planning across the Triangle <br /> After discussion the members decided to forward a memo to the BOCC including <br /> the following concerns: <br /> 1. The Greenprint should be developed using a broad set of agricultural <br /> stakeholders to develop pnonties for farmland preservation. We suggest <br /> using Agricultural Preservation Boards where they exist(Orange, Durham <br /> and Chatham counties all have boards), as well as other organized <br /> agricultural support groups to Identify critical farmland areas. From our <br /> understanding of the process to date, only a few representatives or a <br /> limited number of groups have been involved in the identification of these <br /> areas. <br /> 2. There is a need to develop common definitions and cricks for the <br /> categories of land in the Greenprint, and to Identify lands of regional value <br /> with enough specificity to enable voluntary protection and preservation of <br /> specific critical lands when opportunities arse. The existing Greenprnt <br /> document is somewhat vague in its identification of these areas for <br /> farmland and forestland, and the definitions and criteria for farmland and <br /> forestland are not clear. <br /> 3. We concur with the goal of the Greampdnt to encourage each County to <br /> become aware of critical areas and to take steps to protect such areas as <br /> they deem appropriate. However, future mechanisms or <br /> recommendations from the Greemprint should not work to diminish any <br /> individual county's own efforts to be proactive in identifying and protecting <br /> these sites - as some counties (like Orange)already have active and <br /> successful programs toward this end. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.