Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> 1 Commissioner Dorosin said the Orange-Chapel Hill midday connector has 15 average <br /> 2 daily riders, and asked if this is accurate. <br /> 3 Theo Letman that is correct for the midday. He said the bulk of that service is provided <br /> 4 around peak travel times (morning and afternoon). <br /> 5 Commissioner Dorosin asked if it is financially feasible to maintain a route that only has <br /> 6 15 average daily riders. <br /> 7 Theo Letman said it is questionable. He said the plan is not etched in marble and can <br /> 8 be changed, with the goal of always improving transit. <br /> 9 Commissioner Dorosin referred to the table in figure ES-2, and asked if staff could <br /> 10 identify the services that would be considered mobility on demand. <br /> 11 Theo Letman said the zonal services and the vanpool services. <br /> 12 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that some of the services in this table are not currently <br /> 13 funded. <br /> 14 Theo Letman said some are currently funded, and items 1, 2 and 3 are proposed for <br /> 15 funding. <br /> 16 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the vanpool subsidy program, item 7, is a mobility-on- <br /> 17 demand service. <br /> 18 Theo Letman said yes, and this service is not currently funded. <br /> 19 Commissioner Dorosin said the idea for a County Uber-type service as been floated <br /> 20 around previously. He said he would like to know projected ridership numbers for some of the <br /> 21 services, so the Board can evaluate the best way to use funding. He said he appreciates the <br /> 22 report and the priority of providing useful transportation services, but wants to make sure <br /> 23 ridership is being optimized, and the most residents being reached by the dollars available. <br /> 24 Commissioner McKee asked if any studies were done on an Uber-like service and the <br /> 25 cost differences between on demand services versus County fleets. <br /> 26 Theo Letman said the consultants looked into existing services as well as researching <br /> 27 other entities that have greater mobility-on-demand services. He said comparisons were <br /> 28 completed and can be brought the Board retreat later this week. <br /> 29 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if there is a status update on the reverse circulator. <br /> 30 Theo Letman said that is one of the items at the top of the list, and was strongly <br /> 31 supported by staff with the consultants. <br /> 32 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if there is a timeline. <br /> 33 Theo Letman said hopefully this year. <br /> 34 Chair Rich said there was a previous suggestion to run the service for a decent period of <br /> 35 time (more than a month), and then evaluate the numbers. She said she even recalls the <br /> 36 proposal of gathering numbers for a 2-year period. <br /> 37 Commissioner Price asked if the anticipated cost to the consumer can be researched to <br /> 38 insure that low income residents can access the transportation. <br /> 39 Commissioner Dorosin said he was not suggesting a private Uber-like service, but <br /> 40 rather a County run model that was on demand and could be subsidized. <br /> 41 Commissioner McKee said he would also like to know how the Department of Social <br /> 42 Services (DSS) and the Health Department could play into offsetting the costs for lower income <br /> 43 residents. <br /> 44 Commissioner Bedford said the report discussed splitting the Hillsborough connector in <br /> 45 two, and noted that some comments said this service is too slow, which affects ridership. She <br /> 46 would like to weigh the cost of adding the additional drivers with the ridership numbers. <br /> 47 Theo Letman said he can get this information. <br /> 48 Commissioner Price the Hillsborough Circulator has been the topic of discussion for <br /> 49 many years, and the issue is that it can take one 5 minutes to get from point A to B, but when <br /> 50 one wants to go back home, it can take 55 minutes. <br />