Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-2004-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 11-03-2004
>
Agenda - 11-03-2004-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:18:33 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:25:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
2004 NS ERCD - Fairview Master Plan Memorandum of Agreement
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2004
Minutes - 20041103
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: County Commissioners <br />.John Link, County Manager <br />COPIES: Gwen Harvey, Asst. County Manager <br />Rod Visser, Asst. County Manager <br />Dave Stancil, ERCD Director <br />Lori Taft, Recreation and Parks Director <br />Pam Jones, Purchasing and Central Services Director <br />FROM: Paul Thames, PE, County Engineer <br />DATE: September 30, 2004 <br />SUBJECT: Cost/feasibility of restoring (removing landfilled material) Fairview Park <br />As per the request of the BOCC, this report outlining my opinion/estimate as to the feasibility/cost <br />to clean up/restore (remove landfill material and dress area) the portion of Fairview Park impacted <br />by historic landfilling activities is provided for the Board's review. The information contained <br />herein was originally generated in response to a request of the Fairview Park Steering Committee <br />and was presented to the committee by way of verbal report in Apri12004. The cleanup cost <br />estimate, with caveats, is as follows. <br />The primary caveat is that there is no accurate accounting as to the quantity or the specific nature <br />(toxicity, etc.) of the material that was landfilled.. For example, in its .Tiny 2002 geotechnical and <br />Phase II site assessment reports (excerpt copies attached), Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc., <br />estimated that the landfilled area contains between 100,000 and 200,000 cubic yards of waste. My <br />own estimate -based on consideration of anecdotal information indicating that landfilling practices <br />consisted of burying waste in discontinuous/non-contiguous trenches excavated with atractor-type <br />backhoe rather than in contiguous cells (current high-efficiency landfilling practice) - is that the <br />landfilled area contains approximately 16,000 cubic yards of waste. <br />A second caveat is that it is very difficult to quantify, in units that can be used to estimate <br />removal/cleanup costs, the amount of waste material dispersed in the landfill cover/cap (a tluee foot <br />fill cap was to be placed on the landfill as a landfill closure process during the Fairview CDBG of <br />the early 1980's) and on the surface of the wooded periphery of the landfill area The Trigon <br />geotechnical report noted the presence of a fill cap in 90% of the soil borings in the landfill area <br />with fill depths varying in thickness from less than one foot to six feet or more. Approximately <br />one-third of the borings contained landfill related trash and debris. An additional ten acres <br />(approximately) of the wooded areas peripheral to the landfilled area contain surface trash and <br />debris. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.