Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-19-2004-7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 10-19-2004
>
Agenda - 10-19-2004-7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:39:55 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/19/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20041019
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Projects Can Be Funded Under Existing Financing Options -Despite the current <br />unavailability of PDF in North Carolina, localities have other readily available <br />financing options. Local governments currently issue debt to pay for the types <br />of projects this legislation would fund, such as general obligation bonds or <br />industrial development bonds.. In addition, the state's extremely (some would <br />say exceedingly) generous economic development package includes varying <br />incentives, grants, tax credits, and funds that encourage local development. <br />The state has also moved toward authorizing certificates of participation <br />(COPS), which can also be issued without voter approval. COPS, as well as <br />lease-purchase arrangements are also already available to local governments <br />and do not require voter approval, <br />Urban Sprawl May be Exacerbated - "Urban sprawl" results when large amounts <br />of undeveloped land outside a city's boundaries is developed for residential or <br />commercial purposes, resulting in the destruction of natural habitats, the <br />reduction of vital wetlands, strained water supplies, and worsened traffic. <br />Because PDF projects may be funded by a city or multiple cities, by a county <br />or multiple counties, and can therefore be used anywhere in the state, it is <br />certainly possible (perhaps likely) that the use of this financing scheme will <br />increase urban sprawl. <br />Annual Report Information is Minimal -The required annual report must include <br />only four pieces of information: 1) the base tax valuation of the property in the <br />district, 2) the current valuation, 3) how much debt remains, and 4) the <br />anticipated date the bond will be paid off.. As a result, no meaningful analysis <br />can be conducted to determine if the project was successful in meeting the <br />initial goals set forth in the development financing plan. For example, the <br />number of jobs anticipated versus actual jobs created will not be in the annual <br />report. An analysis of whether the city was successful in ameliorating the <br />negative impacts attributable to the project will not be found either_ Moreover, <br />in addition to the weak reporting requirements, the reports are not required to <br />be released to the public. <br />No Clowbock Provision -The term "clawbacl<" describes the ability of a <br />municipality to seek reimbursement from a private company that receives <br />some form of government subsidy but fails to meet specific and agreed upon <br />contractual obligations. For example, a city agrees to renovate an existing <br />warehouse bought by XYZ company on the condition that the company be in <br />business and hire 50 people by 2006, but XYZ decides to move to Virginia <br />instead after the renovation is complete Instead of benefiting from the <br />increased property value due to the renovation, XYZ should be required to <br />repay the funds spent by the city. The PDF amendment includes no such <br />requirement. <br />Belief that Taxes Will Not Increase May be Overstated -When an undeveloped <br />piece of land is developed or when a downtown district receives a facelift, <br />inevitably, local governments will incur greater responsibility and thus, their <br />costs of providing the same level of service to the district will rise. Usually, the <br />taxes generated in redeveloped or newly developed areas are used to pay for <br />the normal operating expenses incurred by a district Since the property tax <br />revenues are devoted to paying down the project's financing bond, the issuing <br />district must raise these revenues elsewhere. For example, a city may need <br />additlonal fire or police protection for the area, wastewater treatment facilities <br />may need to be expanded, or roads that lead to the PDF district may need to <br />BTC nEPORT$ ~ NC BUDGET $t TA% CENTER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.