Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-19-2004-7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 10-19-2004
>
Agenda - 10-19-2004-7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:39:55 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/19/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20041019
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
chapelhillnews.com <br />a3 <br />Only Arizona and North Carolina require voter approval for self-financing bonds. <br />The N C Local Government Commission, which includes the state treasurer, must approve any self- <br />financing bonds <br />Town Manager Cal Horton said the bonds would be just one more "tool in the tool kit" if voters <br />approve Amendment One on Nov 2 <br />"Now an economic development tool is utilized depends upon the philosophy of the community," he <br />said "In our community, the philosophy has been to create an environment where businesses can be <br />successful, but there is no tradition in our community of giving hand-outs." <br />Developers of large, mixed-use developments Meadowmont and Southarn Village, for example, were <br />required to pay for all the public improvements needed to support those projects, <br />Still, the prospect of local tax dollars lining the pockets of developers is one of the chief concerns of <br />those opposed to Amendment One. <br />Both the libertarian John Locke Foundation and the liberal Common Sense Foundation have come <br />out against the initiative <br />Chad Adams, director for the Center for Local Innovation, an arm of the John Locke Foundation, said <br />tax-increment financing is unnecessary and will increase public debt without the public's consent.. <br />"This is a corporate giveaway," he said. <br />"You're not doing necessary infrastructure for government, and who's to say development in <br />struggling areas wouldn't come anyway?" <br />David Milts, executive director of Common Sense, said other states have seen tax-increment <br />financing misused Near Chicago, millions were given to Home Depot to support a development. <br />"We are concerned that TIF creates bad jobs, mostly low-wage, service-sectorjobs,"Mills said. <br />"It's just free extra money for big business." <br />Foy agreed TIF isn't always appropriate. <br />"To me, the question is, if you've already decided you're going to do something we're not debating <br />whether to do ii, we're debating how to do it," he said <br />"I think people should not confuse the merit of the project with how you finance the project." <br />TIF has been touted as a good means for areas that have lost manufacturing jobs to rebound <br />Adams points out that the other two times a TIF amendment has appeared on the ballot came after a <br />recession. He said cities Tike Cleveland and Detroit have used TIF in an effort to boost sagging <br />economies, but those places have not escaped tough times. <br />"i'm not going to sit here and say all of them are bad and horrible,' Adams said. "I think we need to be <br />http://www.chapelhillnews.com/news/v-printer/story/ 1727196p-7991250ahtml 10/ 13/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.